Mail archive

RE: [alpine-aports] [PATCH] testing/libgflags: new aport

From: David Huffman <>
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 12:23:33 -0500

Since it only provides a library and not an application, I figured it would be preferable for organization purposes. Was I wrong?

(Sorry about you getting this twice, my email client apparently isn’t a fan of replying to mailing lists without some coercion.)
Warm regards,

David Huffman

From: Sören Tempel
Sent: Saturday, January 9, 2016 10:29 AM
Subject: Re: [alpine-aports] [PATCH] testing/libgflags: new aport

On 09.01.16, David Huffman wrote:
> +# Contributor: David Huffman <>
> +# Maintainer: David Huffman <>
> +pkgname=libgflags
> +pkgver=2.1.2
> +_srcname=gflags-$pkgver

Is there any reason why you called the package libgflags instead of
simply naming it gflags? Than you wouldn't need the _srcname variable...


Received on Sat Jan 09 2016 - 12:23:33 GMT