Re: [alpine-aports] [PATCH] testing/mini-sendmail: new aport
Yes I noticed too & sent a version 2 patch last night with a LICENSE in
On 02/10/2016 02:34 AM, Isaac Dunham wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 06:36:39PM +0000, IT Developer wrote:
>> From mini_sendmail.c
>> /* mini_sendmail - accept email on behalf of real sendmail
>> ** Copyright © 1999,2015 by Jef Poskanzer <jef_at_mail.acme.com>.
>> ** All rights reserved.
>> ** Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
>> ** modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
>> ** are met:
>> ** 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
>> ** notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
>> ** 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
>> ** notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
>> ** documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
>> ** THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE AUTHOR AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND
>> ** ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
>> ** IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
>> ** ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE
>> ** FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR
>> ** DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS
>> ** OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION)
>> ** HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT,
>> ** LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY
>> ** OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF
>> ** SUCH DAMAGE.
> In other words, 2-clause BSD-style.
> You need to add the text of that license to the documentation
> (see clause 2), unless "make install" installs it.
> And if it does, you should probably drop it in
> As a general rule:
> If it says 'custom', you should (and probably need to) install a copy of
> the license.
> Unless you have something under WTFPL, CC0, unlicense, 'copy as you can',
> or similar, the license probably requires including it in the docs.
Received on Wed Feb 10 2016 - 12:09:40 UTC