~alpine/aports

This thread contains a patchset. You're looking at the original emails, but you may wish to use the patch review UI. Review patch
3 2

[alpine-aports] [PATCH] testing/openblas: upgrade to 0.2.15

Michael Koloberdin <koloberdin@gmail.com>
Details
Message ID
<1448794998-13309-1-git-send-email-koloberdin@gmail.com>
Sender timestamp
1448794998
DKIM signature
missing
Download raw message
Patch: +4 -4
---
 testing/openblas/APKBUILD | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/testing/openblas/APKBUILD b/testing/openblas/APKBUILD
index 37efad4..51f94b9 100644
--- a/testing/openblas/APKBUILD
+++ b/testing/openblas/APKBUILD
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
# Contributor: Isaac Dunham <ibid.ag@gmail.com>
# Maintainer: Isaac Dunham <ibid.ag@gmail.com>
pkgname=openblas
pkgver=0.2.14
pkgver=0.2.15
pkgrel=0
pkgdesc="A fast BSD-licensed BLAS based on gotoBLAS2, with LAPACK"
url="http://www.openblas.net"
@@ -44,6 +44,6 @@ package() {
		install -m 0644 $FILE "$pkgdir/usr/share/doc/$pkgname" || return 1
	done
}
md5sums="53cda7f420e1ba0ea55de536b24c9701  openblas-0.2.14.tar.gz"
sha256sums="2411c4f56f477b42dff54db2b7ffc0b7cf53bb9778d54982595c64cc69c40fc1  openblas-0.2.14.tar.gz"
sha512sums="8ab1e50cad6fe403addd892e0eebd008cd5009e33f9b29c19a6bc4c8623b6af055fe43d896edbe3ecbda0f5f8c208c2965ad56d2c6945442cce0ec7f3606452f  openblas-0.2.14.tar.gz"
md5sums="b1190f3d3471685f17cfd1ec1d252ac9  openblas-0.2.15.tar.gz"
sha256sums="73c40ace5978282224e5e122a41c8388c5a19e65a6f2329c2b7c0b61bacc9044  openblas-0.2.15.tar.gz"
sha512sums="5b61556a9bd2c622bc31ec7a1b4cbab67740e40c4f0717670b16987d687efdd83d3bd8b2c0b158a8da956ef04665cf9a00b6b1f1619b6353a206a31a5e5d6c9a  openblas-0.2.15.tar.gz"
-- 
2.4.1



---
Unsubscribe:  alpine-aports+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help:         alpine-aports+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---
Details
Message ID
<20151129134233.GA18182@francium.fritz.box>
In-Reply-To
<1448794998-13309-1-git-send-email-koloberdin@gmail.com> (view parent)
Sender timestamp
1448804553
DKIM signature
missing
Download raw message
Hey,

Thanks for you patch but I get a huge amount of redefinition warnings
when trying to compile openblas:

<command-line>:0:0: warning: "ASMNAME" redefined
<command-line>:0:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
<command-line>:0:0: warning: "ASMFNAME" redefined
<command-line>:0:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
<command-line>:0:0: warning: "NAME" redefined
<command-line>:0:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
<command-line>:0:0: warning: "CNAME" redefined
<command-line>:0:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
<command-line>:0:0: warning: "CHAR_NAME" redefined
<command-line>:0:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
<command-line>:0:0: warning: "CHAR_CNAME" redefined
<command-line>:0:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition

However, I also get those warnings when compiling the old version. Not
sure if their build system is just broken but we might want to fix
that...

Sören.


---
Unsubscribe:  alpine-aports+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help:         alpine-aports+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---
Isaac Dunham <ibid.ag@gmail.com>
Details
Message ID
<20151130015741.GA3416@newbook>
In-Reply-To
<20151129134233.GA18182@francium.fritz.box> (view parent)
Sender timestamp
1448848662
DKIM signature
missing
Download raw message
On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 02:42:33PM +0100, Sören Tempel wrote:
> Hey,
> 
> Thanks for you patch but I get a huge amount of redefinition warnings
> when trying to compile openblas:
> 
> <command-line>:0:0: warning: "ASMNAME" redefined
> <command-line>:0:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
> <command-line>:0:0: warning: "ASMFNAME" redefined
> <command-line>:0:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
> <command-line>:0:0: warning: "NAME" redefined
> <command-line>:0:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
> <command-line>:0:0: warning: "CNAME" redefined
> <command-line>:0:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
> <command-line>:0:0: warning: "CHAR_NAME" redefined
> <command-line>:0:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
> <command-line>:0:0: warning: "CHAR_CNAME" redefined
> <command-line>:0:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
> 
> However, I also get those warnings when compiling the old version. Not
> sure if their build system is just broken but we might want to fix
> that...

Yes, it's a standard problem; any -D... flag ends up in multiple make
variables. (The problem will require patching the Makefile, but I haven't
looked at it closely.)

Thanks,
Isaac Dunham


---
Unsubscribe:  alpine-aports+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help:         alpine-aports+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---
Isaac Dunham <ibid.ag@gmail.com>
Details
Message ID
<20160326032437.GB13725@newbook>
In-Reply-To
<20151130015741.GA3416@newbook> (view parent)
Sender timestamp
1458962681
DKIM signature
missing
Download raw message
On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 05:57:41PM -0800, Isaac Dunham wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 02:42:33PM +0100, Sören Tempel wrote:
> > Hey,
> > 
> > Thanks for you patch but I get a huge amount of redefinition warnings
> > when trying to compile openblas:
> > 
> > <command-line>:0:0: warning: "ASMNAME" redefined
> > <command-line>:0:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
> > <command-line>:0:0: warning: "ASMFNAME" redefined
> > <command-line>:0:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
> > <command-line>:0:0: warning: "NAME" redefined
> > <command-line>:0:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
> > <command-line>:0:0: warning: "CNAME" redefined
> > <command-line>:0:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
> > <command-line>:0:0: warning: "CHAR_NAME" redefined
> > <command-line>:0:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
> > <command-line>:0:0: warning: "CHAR_CNAME" redefined
> > <command-line>:0:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
> > 
> > However, I also get those warnings when compiling the old version. Not
> > sure if their build system is just broken but we might want to fix
> > that...
> 
> Yes, it's a standard problem; any -D... flag ends up in multiple make
> variables. (The problem will require patching the Makefile, but I haven't
> looked at it closely.)

Looking at it, this happens as a result of passing CFLAGS in the
environment.
Why, I'm not sure, but it can be avoided via
CFLAGS= make CFLAGS="$CFLAGS"

Thanks,
Isaac Dunham


---
Unsubscribe:  alpine-aports+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help:         alpine-aports+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---
Reply to thread Export thread (mbox)