Mail archive
alpine-aports

Re: [alpine-aports] [PATCH] testing/mhddfs: new aport

From: Zsolt Mészárovics <zsolt_at_meszarovics.me>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 12:45:32 +0100

Yes, mhddfs depends on it. It's just a set of header files, a set of
macros, no .so or anything like that, so I thought it's acceptable
like this, but I'm happy to create an uthash-dev or similar, if that's
preferred.

On 22 March 2016 at 12:38, Natanael Copa <ncopa_at_alpinelinux.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 13:11:46 +0000
> Zsolt M <zsolt_at_meszarovics.me> wrote:
>
>> http://mhddfs.uvw.ru/
>> A fuse-based file system for unifying several mount points into one.
> ...
>> +_uthashver=1.9.9
>> +source="http://mhddfs.uvw.ru/downloads/${pkgname}_${pkgver}.tar.gz
>> + saveas-https://github.com/troydhanson/uthash/archive/v${_uthashver}.tar.gz/uthash-v${_uthashver}.tar.gz
>> + local-uthash.patch"
>
> Is uthash relly needed?
>
> Why don't we ship uthash as separate package?
>
> -nc


---
Unsubscribe:  alpine-aports+unsubscribe_at_lists.alpinelinux.org
Help:         alpine-aports+help_at_lists.alpinelinux.org
---
Received on Tue Mar 22 2016 - 12:45:32 GMT