Mail archive
alpine-aports

Re: [alpine-aports] Older versions

From: Cág <ca6c_at_bitmessage.ch>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 20:39:02 +0000

Hello,

José María García Pérez wrote:

> 2. Should I create a new package (call it swig2)?

I think this sounds more reasonable. It is already done with llvm and python
for example. Of course file names shouldn't be conflicting, in case you plan
to make it unconflicting with swig.

> 3. Is it OK to "embed" the particular library version in the package that
> requires it?

What about making a package with this old library version? Same conditions as
above.


Cheers

-- 
caóc
---
Unsubscribe:  alpine-aports+unsubscribe_at_lists.alpinelinux.org
Help:         alpine-aports+help_at_lists.alpinelinux.org
---
Received on Thu Nov 16 2017 - 20:39:02 GMT