Re: [alpine-aports] Older versions
José María García Pérez wrote:
> 2. Should I create a new package (call it swig2)?
I think this sounds more reasonable. It is already done with llvm and python
for example. Of course file names shouldn't be conflicting, in case you plan
to make it unconflicting with swig.
> 3. Is it OK to "embed" the particular library version in the package that
> requires it?
What about making a package with this old library version? Same conditions as
Received on Thu Nov 16 2017 - 20:39:02 GMT