Re: [alpine-devel] considering packaging another mailx
Il giorno sab, 13/09/2014 alle 13.33 -0700, Isaac Dunham ha scritto:
> I'm inclined to think that in the short term, heirloom-mailx would be
> a significant improvement over our current main/mailx.
> What I'd like to do is add testing/heirloom-mailx providing mailx;
> I have a preliminary aport without the provides part.
> In the future, upgrading to s-nail seems like a logical path; but
> I think that using s-nail now might be hasty.
I'm a mailx user and I 100% agree with your proposed plan.
Received on Sat Sep 13 2014 - 22:44:00 UTC