Re: [alpine-devel] Rename proposal of alpine .ISOs
On 10/18/2015 11:16 PM, 7heo wrote:
>> Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2015 at 1:46 PM
>> From: "Alan Pillay" <alanppillay4_at_gmail.com>
>> To: alpine-devel_at_lists.alpinelinux.org
>> Subject: [alpine-devel] Rename proposal of alpine .ISOs
>> The current Standard" .iso" on http://www.alpinelinux.org/downloads/
>> is of the alpine Linux distribution + lots of packages to use it as a
>> router/firewall/etc as was alpine's first goal. However, I think most
>> people nowadays don't use it like that anymore. Also, there's nothing
>> in the name to indicate the "Standard" .iso"comes with all those
>> things. Because of that most people downloading alpine are installing
>> many packages they never touch. What they actually are looking for is
>> probably the "Mini" .iso. Not only that, but the "Vanilla" .iso is the
>> "Mini" .iso with linux vanilla kernel, but there's nothing to indicate
>> that, and it looks like Vanilla is the "Standard" .iso with some
>> With all this put, I propose the following:
>> Standard -> Network (Router/Firewall/VPN/VoIP/etc)
>> Mini -> Standard
>> What does everyone think?
>> I believe this is what makes the most sense now that Alpine is a
>> general purpose distribution.
>> Thanks for your time.
>> Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe_at_lists.alpinelinux.org
>> Help: alpine-devel+help_at_lists.alpinelinux.org
> I would also get rid of the iso format as the main one, as nobody burns installation medias anymore. It would be much better to have a dd'able installation image.
My 2 bits, sorry but I'd like to disagree with this, I find iso format's
perfect for test and trialing. Also for passing on to windows users as
they seem to be able to burn them correctly first go.
Received on Mon Oct 19 2015 - 11:05:12 GMT