Mail archive
alpine-devel

Re: [alpine-devel] Alpine and armv7

From: Natanael Copa <ncopa_at_alpinelinux.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 18:53:15 +0200

On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 18:50:33 +0300
Timo Teras <timo.teras_at_iki.fi> wrote:

> On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 17:43:02 +0300
> Timo Teräs <timo.teras_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 19 Sep 2018, 16.47 Natanael Copa, <ncopa_at_alpinelinux.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > > _at_ncopa What do you think?
> > >
> > > I am in favor of this too. Do we need add armv7 while keeping armhf
> > > as armv6? Or can we simply replace the current armhf build with
> > > armv7? Then the triplet would correspond better with debian, if i
> > > understand things correctly.
> > >
> >
> > Let's keep armhf still for a while. I suggest we bootstrap armv7 on
> > x86-64 and start new builder edge/armv7. Once all builds, we can poll
> > how many still need armhf.
> >
> > And yes armv7 is more common now than armhf. Raspbian originally was
> > armhf equivalent. Rpi1 was the only major benefiter.
> >
> > I can bootstrap armv7 packages. And put them somewhere.
> >
> > Meanwhile, we probably want to patch aports to change all arch places
> > from armhf to armhf+armv7, or potentially add "arm" as umbrella for
> > all the 32bit arm builds and change armhf to that. Maybe someone can
> > do that while I prepare the initial package set cross built.
>
> Initial bootstrap build completed.
>
> Packages are at:
> http://dev.alpinelinux.org/~tteras/armv7/
>
> Let's start a new edge builder using those.

Looks like we need add more diskspace for this.

Carlo, can you help us with this?

-nc




---
Unsubscribe:  alpine-devel+unsubscribe_at_lists.alpinelinux.org
Help:         alpine-devel+help_at_lists.alpinelinux.org
---
Received on Wed Sep 19 2018 - 18:53:15 UTC