Re: [alpine-user] apk(1) error does not go away
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 10:32 AM, Steffen Nurpmeso <steffen_at_sdaoden.eu> wrote:
> Juhu on a Monday!
> William Pitcock <nenolod_at_dereferenced.org> wrote:
> |On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 6:33 PM, Steffen Nurpmeso <steffen_at_sdaoden.eu> \
> |> William Pitcock <nenolod_at_dereferenced.org> wrote:
> |>|On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 2:59 PM, Steffen Nurpmeso <steffen_at_sdaoden.eu> \
> |>|> Cág <ca6c_at_bitmessage.ch> wrote:
> |>|>|Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
> |>|The issue is that something (probably a maintainer script) in your dma
> |>|package failed to run successfully and, now, the original package is
> |> Yes. Thank you again. The issue was indeed postfix being also
> |> installed and dma wanting to
> |> (1/1) Installing dma (0.11-r6)
> |> ERROR: dma-0.11-r6: trying to overwrite usr/sbin/sendmail owned \
> |> by postfix-3.2.4-r1.
> |> ERROR: dma-0.11-r6: trying to overwrite usr/bin/mailq owned by \
> |> postfix-3.2.4-r1.
> |If you want to have both postfix and dma installed at the same time,
> |you could put replaces="postfix" on the DMA package to get rid of this
> Oh, i thought this would be quite the opposite, i.e., forcefully
> rejecting or replacing those mentioned?! I have looked at exim,
> who does not do anything regarding replaces= etc., so i kept that
> part of the DMA APKBUILD the way it was. I mean, if the DMA
> package as posted on -ports is not updated the desired way then
> i have to stick with a manual compilation of DMA for now anyway..
> But thanks a lot for the feedback!
replaces=postfix here means DMA is allowed to replace specific Postfix files.
We don't normally do this sort of thing because it's not really a
configuration people normally would be using, which is why I offered
it in the context of "if you really want both installed at once."
Received on Mon Feb 12 2018 - 15:02:04 UTC