X-Original-To: alpine-aports@mail.alpinelinux.org Delivered-To: alpine-aports@mail.alpinelinux.org Received: from mail.alpinelinux.org (dallas-a1.alpinelinux.org [127.0.0.1]) by mail.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B030DC83DB for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 17:18:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay2-d.mail.gandi.net (relay2-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.194]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE2E8DC718F for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 17:18:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mfilter49-d.gandi.net (mfilter49-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.180]) by relay2-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01D66C5A76; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 18:18:31 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter49-d.gandi.net Received: from relay2-d.mail.gandi.net ([IPv6:::ffff:217.70.183.194]) by mfilter49-d.gandi.net (mfilter49-d.gandi.net [::ffff:10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5umJ68O0ljm8; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 18:18:29 +0100 (CET) X-Originating-IP: 193.248.36.207 Received: from [192.168.1.217] (LCaen-656-1-170-207.w193-248.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.248.36.207]) (Authenticated sender: marc.vertes@ugrid.net) by relay2-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 63146C5A7E; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 18:18:29 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailinglist: alpine-aports Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\)) Subject: Re: [alpine-aports] [PATCH] testing/mongodb: fix for #5117 From: Marc Vertes In-Reply-To: <20160223191612.6f25f25b@vostro> Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 18:18:28 +0100 Cc: alpine-aports@lists.alpinelinux.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <6B28E7B4-454F-4391-AA4E-498D73DD811A@ugrid.net> References: <1456247469-958-1-git-send-email-marc.vertes@ugrid.net> <20160223191612.6f25f25b@vostro> To: Timo Teras X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP > > Technically the getrlimit() is perfectly ok to do on all platforms. But > we know glibc returns rlimit anway, so it can be skipped there. > > I would have put all of the base/size twiddling inside the if(). Then > struct rlimit does not need initialization either. But thats a minor > thingy. You care to fix that, or should I just apply this? > Ok, let met fix, test and resubmit. Thanks, Marc --- Unsubscribe: alpine-aports+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-aports+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---