Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160210113837.GA21833@francium.lan>
References: <1454934359-3536-1-git-send-email-valery.kartel@gmail.com>
	<20160210113837.GA21833@francium.lan>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 18:49:10 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKTwcDOds-HnO5DGPnNidvXao1RGO-UC5PpXw6SycT5gWEB_Qw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [alpine-aports] [PATCH] main/dropbear: add ssh command in -ssh subpackage
From: Valery Kartel <valery.kartel@gmail.com>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?S=C3=B6ren_Tempel?= <soeren@soeren-tempel.net>
Cc: alpine-aports@lists.alpinelinux.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1141ef5a91197d052b6d3683

--001a1141ef5a91197d052b6d3683
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I just add ssh exactly like scp. I think it's better to include it all to
main package and allow opennssh-client to replace it with own binaries. In
other words, made it like busybox with symlinks, that are replaced by
linux-utils, coreutils etc.
10 =D0=BB=D1=8E=D1=82. 2016 13:38 "S=C3=B6ren Tempel" <soeren@soeren-tempel=
.net> =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5:

> On 08.02.16, Valery Kartel wrote:
> > +_ssh() {
> > +     pkgdesc=3D"Dropbear ssh command"
> > +     depends=3D"dropbear !openssh-client"
> > +     arch=3D"noarch"
> > +     mkdir -p "$subpkgdir"/usr/bin
> > +     mv "$pkgdir"/usr/bin/ssh "$subpkgdir"/usr/bin/
> > +}
>
> I like the idea of having -ssh and -scp subpackages for dropbear,
> however, correct me if I am wrong but the `/usr/bin/ssh` is just a
> symlink to dropbear multi (so is `/usr/bin/scp`) does it really make
> sense to have subpackages for symlinks? Wouldn't it make more sense to
> not use the multicall binary if we want to split this package into
> multiple subpackages?
>
> S=C3=B6ren.
>

--001a1141ef5a91197d052b6d3683
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<p dir=3D"ltr">I just add ssh exactly like scp. I think it&#39;s better to =
include it all to main package and allow opennssh-client to replace it with=
 own binaries. In other words, made it like busybox with symlinks, that are=
 replaced by linux-utils, coreutils etc.</p>
<div class=3D"gmail_quote">10 =D0=BB=D1=8E=D1=82. 2016 13:38 &quot;S=C3=B6r=
en Tempel&quot; &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:soeren@soeren-tempel.net">soeren@soer=
en-tempel.net</a>&gt; =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5:<br type=3D"attribution"><bl=
ockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #=
ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On 08.02.16, Valery Kartel wrote:<br>
&gt; +_ssh() {<br>
&gt; +=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0pkgdesc=3D&quot;Dropbear ssh command&quot;<br>
&gt; +=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0depends=3D&quot;dropbear !openssh-client&quot;<br=
>
&gt; +=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0arch=3D&quot;noarch&quot;<br>
&gt; +=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0mkdir -p &quot;$subpkgdir&quot;/usr/bin<br>
&gt; +=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0mv &quot;$pkgdir&quot;/usr/bin/ssh &quot;$subpkgd=
ir&quot;/usr/bin/<br>
&gt; +}<br>
<br>
I like the idea of having -ssh and -scp subpackages for dropbear,<br>
however, correct me if I am wrong but the `/usr/bin/ssh` is just a<br>
symlink to dropbear multi (so is `/usr/bin/scp`) does it really make<br>
sense to have subpackages for symlinks? Wouldn&#39;t it make more sense to<=
br>
not use the multicall binary if we want to split this package into<br>
multiple subpackages?<br>
<br>
S=C3=B6ren.<br>
</blockquote></div>

--001a1141ef5a91197d052b6d3683--


---
Unsubscribe:  alpine-aports+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help:         alpine-aports+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---