X-Original-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Delivered-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Received: from mail.wtbts.no (mail.wtbts.no [213.234.126.131]) by lists.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D89A71EBFF8 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 16:37:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (bsna.nor.wtbts.net [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wtbts.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC5A4AE4004; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 16:37:19 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Yes Received: from mail.wtbts.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bsna.nor.wtbts.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b+ZuzNguRMbD; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 16:37:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ytre.org (extmail.nor.wtbts.net [10.65.72.14]) by mail.wtbts.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC93E376250; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 16:37:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ytre.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ytre.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 619C7621BF7F6; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 16:37:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.65.96.20]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ncopa@ytre.org) by mail.ytre.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 06F54621BF7F5; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 16:37:16 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 18:37:08 +0200 From: Natanael Copa To: Mark Constable Cc: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] Why? ACF - million repos Message-ID: <20110331183708.66f87d63@alpinelinux.org> In-Reply-To: <201104010150.33799.markc@renta.net> References: <4D94795D.7040206@iki.fi> <20110331165637.58c54e83@ncopa-desktop.nor.wtbts.net> <201104010150.33799.markc@renta.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.24.0; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 01:50:33 +1000 Mark Constable wrote: > On 01/04/11, Natanael Copa wrote: > > I'd rather have 52 separate APKBUILDs using same source > > package than having 1 APKBUILD with 52 different subpackages > > with different version numbers. > > Why not have a single meta repo, ie; acf-all, that has a single > APKBUILD with it's own version number and the build() does a > git submodule pull on all the other separate acf modules and > packs them all up into a single package. yeah, git has some support for submodules. I have no experience with those but that might be something to check up. -nc --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---