X-Original-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Delivered-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Received: from mail.wtbts.no (mail.wtbts.no [213.234.126.131]) by lists.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A19020C847 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 17:33:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (bsna.nor.wtbts.net [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wtbts.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35289AE4002; Mon, 2 May 2011 17:33:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Yes Received: from mail.wtbts.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bsna.nor.wtbts.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QUqlS+RLeMpe; Mon, 2 May 2011 17:33:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ytre.org (extmail.nor.wtbts.net [10.65.72.14]) by mail.wtbts.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03EB1AE4001; Mon, 2 May 2011 17:33:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ytre.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ytre.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6707621BD357; Mon, 2 May 2011 17:33:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncopa-desktop.nor.wtbts.net (unknown [10.65.65.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ncopa@ytre.org) by mail.ytre.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FF34621BD355; Mon, 2 May 2011 17:33:01 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 19:29:48 +0200 From: Natanael Copa To: Natanael Copa Cc: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] switch to segmexec or stay on 2.6.38.2 Message-ID: <20110502192948.444cdb18@ncopa-desktop.nor.wtbts.net> In-Reply-To: <20110502155016.201e8577@ncopa-desktop.nor.wtbts.net> References: <20110502155016.201e8577@ncopa-desktop.nor.wtbts.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.24.0; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP On Mon, 2 May 2011 15:50:16 +0200 Natanael Copa wrote: > So what do you guys think: we switch to segmexec now in last minute or > we stay on 2.6.38.2? FWIW, I tested to enable both SEGMEXEC and PAGEEXEC. I think this will make the kernel use SEGMEXEC when cpu has no NX support and PAGEEXEC otherwise. This seems to work so far. Do you think its ok we do this for 2.2.0 release tomorrow? The kernel is in testing. -nc --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---