X-Original-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Received: from mx1.tetrasec.net (mx1.tetrasec.net [74.117.190.25]) by lists.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 767DA5C3A1F for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 10:55:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx1.tetrasec.net (mail.local [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.tetrasec.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 314239E2452; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 10:55:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ncopa-desktop.copa.dup.pw (15.63.200.37.customer.cdi.no [37.200.63.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: n@tanael.org) by mx1.tetrasec.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1CB659E1D02; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 10:55:40 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 12:55:33 +0200 From: Natanael Copa To: Roberto Oliveira Cc: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] Change Travis in Alpine Continuous Integration Message-ID: <20170712125533.4b1e5b63@ncopa-desktop.copa.dup.pw> In-Reply-To: <8a467904-a94c-fdbb-6817-12f9d32baf4f@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <8a467904-a94c-fdbb-6817-12f9d32baf4f@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.0-dirty (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-alpine-linux-musl) X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 20:47:53 -0300 Roberto Oliveira wrote: > Hi Folks, > > Alpine CI currently uses Travis to build packages when a pull request is > opened. However Travis only support x86_64 and it just build the changes > in this architecture. > > Jenkins currently have support for more architectures and we could use > it instead of Travis. Jenkins has a plugin called "GitHub pull request > builder" that allows to listen when a pull request is opened in GitHub > and build with the changes. > > We could install Jenkins in a machine and create nodes for other > machines of different architectures allowing packages to be built in the > architectures we need. > > What do you think about using using Jenkins instead of Travis? I don't know if other tools are better suited (eg buildbot) but I am all for adding CI for other arches we can catch arch specific errors before they enter our git master. Jenkins is probably not something I would have used myself, but I also believe that the person doing the job should have liberty to pick the tools for it too. Also, if we could get jenkins run on alpine, then it would be a nice showcase. -nc > > > Regards, > Roberto Oliveira > > > > > > --- > Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org > Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org > --- > --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---