Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 13:58:38 -0400
From: Drew DeVault <sir@cmpwn.com>
To: Ted Trask <ttrask01@yahoo.com>
Cc: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org
Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] [PATCH 2/2] Rework the base team description
Message-ID: <20190409175838.GE21799@homura.localdomain>
References: <20190409050210.20217-1-sir@cmpwn.com>
 <20190409050210.20217-3-sir@cmpwn.com>
 <F2137E1D-EF43-4109-9015-17199BBFC2D8@yahoo.com>
 <20190409133140.GB21799@homura.localdomain>
 <6B5C3246-C8D8-4CE8-8A56-8ECBADE4654B@yahoo.com>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <6B5C3246-C8D8-4CE8-8A56-8ECBADE4654B@yahoo.com>

On 2019-04-09  1:55 PM, Ted Trask wrote:
> There is a big difference between sharing the workload and giving up
> authority. My main objection is to the stipulation that a base team
> member cannot be reelected immediately. Not only is ncopa sharing
> authority with two others for the first three years, he would be
> forced to give up all authority in the fourth year. Or am I reading it
> wrong?

You're interpreting it correctly, though I assume ncopa will continue to
serve his roles in teams other than base during that time. I think that
you should trust ncopa to back a governance model he believes will work,
even if it means he has to take a break every few years. He is far from
uninvolved in these discussions, I suggest you trust his judgement in
this matter. After all, if he doesn't want the authority then it's not
your place to force him to accept it.


---
Unsubscribe:  alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help:         alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---