X-Original-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Received: from mail.wyraz.de (vpsprod2.wyraz.de [188.68.49.93]) by lists.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DD255C6363 for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2018 20:10:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wyraz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5474B31AC66 for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2018 22:10:51 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.wyraz.de Received: from mail.wyraz.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.wyraz.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7bGwcdUxfRZO for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2018 22:10:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.149] (teilnehmer4-86.koetschlitz.de [94.101.42.86]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wyraz.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2018 22:10:22 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] Proposal: Multi-Arch matrix builds on travis-ci To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org References: <63122645-4b33-c850-b30c-af77519f5f2d@jirutka.cz> <1537559060.3146069.1516423416.0F09A000@webmail.messagingengine.com> From: Michael Wyraz Message-ID: <5a748347-ceeb-45cd-805d-a6917569b3b2@wyraz.de> Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 22:10:21 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.0 X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1537559060.3146069.1516423416.0F09A000@webmail.messagingengine.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US-large I did my tests with QEMU 3.0: x86_64: 48s armhf via qemu: 334s so far away from "ok" ;-/ Am 21.09.18 um 21:44 schrieb Jean-Louis Fuchs: > Hi > > On Wed, 19 Sep 2018, at 11:17, Jakub Jirutka wrote: > >> I didn't use it in aports intentionally, because it's *very* slow. Many >> aports would fail to build due to exceeding the time limit (50 minutes) >> and it would significantly increase waiting time for all builds (due to >> exhausted job queue). > There was or is bug in qemu-user-static, that made it terribly slow. This version: > > $> ./qemu-arm-static --version > qemu-arm version 2.9.1(qemu-2.9.1-2.fc26) > > is definitely ok, I haven't tested any newer ones. In my opinion most builds should not fail due time limit on travis. BUT the tests sometimes do, after all its not the correct kernel. I am moving towards qemu-system using netboot for my development. netboot boots surprisingly consistent across architectures. You can append apkovl= to provision the VM. > > Best, > Jean-Louis > > > --- > Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org > Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org > --- > --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---