Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] Planning for 3.10 release
To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org
References: <20190403172825.5e8384b3@ncopa-desktop.copa.dup.pw>
 <430d21fc-3200-e7a0-8a12-adbee970cb18@fraho.eu>
From: Tuan Hoang <tmhoang@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 18:17:48 +0200
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <430d21fc-3200-e7a0-8a12-adbee970cb18@fraho.eu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <6ceb79ab-9863-3f3b-c82e-9e70148018e0@linux.ibm.com>

Thank you for the tremendous effort.

openjdk is such a monster, especially to build repeatedly. And/or
cross-building ...

Tuan

On 4/3/19 7:24 PM, Simon Frankenberger wrote:
> On 03.04.2019 17:28, Natanael Copa wrote:
>> Things that I would like to have included in 3.10:
>> - openjdk9 and openjdk10?
> 
> From my side that's no problem and I'd really appreciate it. Openjdk9 is
> already in testing and seems to run stable, Openjdk10 PR is opened and
> OpenJDK11 is ready, but waiting for 10 to get merged.
> 
> The only issue with these packages is that they only build on 64 bit
> arches natively, although cross-compiling seems to work without problems.
> 
> So, OpenJDK 9+10 (and most probably 11) builds fine on s390x, aarch64,
> x86_64 and ppce64le (as far as I can see), but x86, armhf and armv7 fail
> and I don't know why.
> 
> I'm currently trying to get the build running for at least x86, but for
> the other arches I'm not sure what's happening there and how to fix /
> debug it. My "infrastructure" is basicaly a bunch of shell scripts with
> qemu-static binfmt emulation and there it works.
> 
> @Natanael: If you're OK to have java only for 64 bit (for now) then lets
> get 9+10+11 into community asap :)
> 
> Thanks,
> Simon
> 



---
Unsubscribe:  alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help:         alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---