From: "Laurent Bercot" <ska-devel@skarnet.org>
To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org
Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] Code of Conduct
Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 09:59:44 +0000
Message-Id: <em9c59a7dc-1451-406d-9c85-ee45330b6e58@elzian>
In-Reply-To: <7e304eda-7ffc-6bd0-87ec-76c12f0f2e3b@mail.com>
References: <b9e377ea-d214-6a1f-df7d-06c4ec37f13e@mail.com>
 <412A395A-202C-490A-B113-C5580CCD4AE4@shiz.me>
 <c7e759aa-042b-4a42-acb6-8778727742a5@mail.com>
 <7e304eda-7ffc-6bd0-87ec-76c12f0f2e3b@mail.com>
Reply-To: "Laurent Bercot" <ska-devel@skarnet.org>
User-Agent: eM_Client/7.1.30115.0
Precedence: list
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


  Thank you, Theo, for undertaking this.

  I have a small meta point to make: to the best of my knowledge, the=20
Alpine
community, although much friendlier than the majority of tech=20
communities
out there, is not exactly diverse. We are overwhelmingly white men -
nothing wrong with that, but we have not experienced harassment as other
people have, and I'd be reluctant to endorse a CoC without at least=20
having
it reviewed by people who are more likely to be on the receiving end of
online abuse, by people who can bring experience or at least another
perspective on this.

  So, can we please bring women, trans people, non-white people, disabled
people, in the conversation? or at least, if we know such people in=20
tech,
can we simply run the CoC drafts by them and see if they notice=20
something
that we wouldn't ?

  Thanks,

--
  Laurent



---
Unsubscribe:  alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help:         alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---