Thanks for providing a patch that quickly.
On 13.02.17, Valery Kartel wrote:
> local file> - for file in c2ph corelist enc2xs instmodsh h2ph h2xs libnetcfg> perldoc \> - perlivp perlthanks pl2pm pod2html pod2man pod2text> pod2usage \> - podchecker podselect xsubpp $pkgname$pkgver> + for file in c2ph instmodsh h2ph h2xs libnetcfg perlivp> perlthanks \> + pl2pm pod2html pod2usage podchecker podselect xsubpp> $pkgname$pkgver> do> mv "$pkgdir"/usr/bin/$file "$subpkgdir"/usr/bin/ ||> return 1> done
What about the other pod* scripts? pod2html, pod2usage, ...
Shouldn't they be moved back to the origin package as well?
Sören.
---
Unsubscribe: alpine-aports+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help: alpine-aports+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---
On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 13:58:44 +0100
Sören Tempel <soeren@soeren-tempel.net> wrote:
> Thanks for providing a patch that quickly.> > On 13.02.17, Valery Kartel wrote:> > local file> > - for file in c2ph corelist enc2xs instmodsh h2ph h2xs libnetcfg> > perldoc \> > - perlivp perlthanks pl2pm pod2html pod2man pod2text> > pod2usage \> > - podchecker podselect xsubpp $pkgname$pkgver> > + for file in c2ph instmodsh h2ph h2xs libnetcfg perlivp> > perlthanks \> > + pl2pm pod2html pod2usage podchecker podselect xsubpp> > $pkgname$pkgver> > do> > mv "$pkgdir"/usr/bin/$file "$subpkgdir"/usr/bin/ ||> > return 1> > done > > What about the other pod* scripts? pod2html, pod2usage, ...> Shouldn't they be moved back to the origin package as well?
I just got bitten by this for xen.
Where do we want to have pod* scripts?
Should we fix the APKBUILDs to depend on perl-dev to be able to
generate manual pages with pod2man?
Should we have a separate pod* package?
Should we ship those tools with 'perl' like we did earlier?
The commit log does not explain *why* those changes was made in the
first place so I am afraid of just reverting.
Valery, what problem did you try to solve by moving pod* scripts to
-dev?
It would also be great if you could also explain *why* we need
to restore the current compatibility in the commit message for the
"main/perl: restore the current compatibility" patch.
Thanks!
-nc
---
Unsubscribe: alpine-aports+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help: alpine-aports+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---
On 27.02.17, Natanael Copa wrote:
> Where do we want to have pod* scripts?> > Should we fix the APKBUILDs to depend on perl-dev to be able to> generate manual pages with pod2man?
We discussed this a bit on the IRC channel and came to the conclusion
that it is actually not that easy to find all APKBUILDs which need
pod2man. So in case we decide to go with this option we should find a
way to reliable find all APKBUILDs that need to be fixed.
On 27.02.17, Natanael Copa wrote:
> Should we have a separate pod* package?
Why would it be necessary to have such a subpackage. I don't think that
we need to fragment the perl package any further.
On 27.02.17, Natanael Copa wrote:
> Should we ship those tools with 'perl' like we did earlier?
I don't see any reason why we shouldn't do that. Unless there is one we
should probably just revert the commit ASAP before more packages get
rebuild without pod2man and thus end up with broken man pages.
Sören.
---
Unsubscribe: alpine-aports+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help: alpine-aports+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---