~alpine/devel

4 4

[alpine-devel] Mailing List Archives

Jeremy Thomerson <jeremy@thomersonfamily.com>
Details
Message ID
<CADVmKVDQ0RRmHpQLhKmv=m89pxkxEAbeKYM9g0ZeZeG_yj_Lbg@mail.gmail.com>
Sender timestamp
1344111523
DKIM signature
missing
Download raw message
Does anyone know why all of the links that Google has for our mailing
lists link to the wrong thing?  I am assuming that we have rebuilt the
archives or something and their cache of the pages is old.  It seems
like we could/should do something to try to remedy this.

Example: go to http://tinyurl.com/c23te2j (a Google search).  The
second link should probably be
http://lists.alpinelinux.org/alpine-devel/1945.html which on Google's
search results page says it is Re: [alpine-devel] autossh / SSH
Persistent Tunnel from Nathan ..., but in actuality it is Re:
[alpine-devel] kamailio kamctl script fixed for dbtext support.

Jeremy


---
Unsubscribe:  alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help:         alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---
Jeff Bilyk <jbilyk@gmail.com>
Details
Message ID
<3130399669570872106@unknownmsgid>
In-Reply-To
<CADVmKVDQ0RRmHpQLhKmv=m89pxkxEAbeKYM9g0ZeZeG_yj_Lbg@mail.gmail.com> (view parent)
Sender timestamp
1344111799
DKIM signature
missing
Download raw message
I noticed the same a while back but ran out of time to investigate.
Is there a specific offset that you noticed?  For example, 1944.HTML
should really be loaded or such?

Jeff

On Aug 4, 2012, at 4:19 PM, Jeremy Thomerson <jeremy@thomersonfamily.com> wrote:

> Does anyone know why all of the links that Google has for our mailing
> lists link to the wrong thing?  I am assuming that we have rebuilt the
> archives or something and their cache of the pages is old.  It seems
> like we could/should do something to try to remedy this.
>
> Example: go to http://tinyurl.com/c23te2j (a Google search).  The
> second link should probably be
> http://lists.alpinelinux.org/alpine-devel/1945.html which on Google's
> search results page says it is Re: [alpine-devel] autossh / SSH
> Persistent Tunnel from Nathan ..., but in actuality it is Re:
> [alpine-devel] kamailio kamctl script fixed for dbtext support.
>
> Jeremy
>
>
> ---
> Unsubscribe:  alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
> Help:         alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
> ---
>


---
Unsubscribe:  alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help:         alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---
Jeremy Thomerson <jeremy@thomersonfamily.com>
Details
Message ID
<CADVmKVBc8wtBqTo-48fo73=XuzZzfp7HU-jTuPwp7OGT2FJrfw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<3130399669570872106@unknownmsgid> (view parent)
Sender timestamp
1344133443
DKIM signature
missing
Download raw message
No.  But, it does seem that the software being used to create the
mailing list archives is poorly designed.  For instance, look at
Google search [1].  It shows that message 0094.html on the
alpine-devel mailing list should be about a patch to Zabbix.

Then, click that link and go to the URL [2].  Message 0094 is your
response on this thread.  But the original message I sent is message
number 0825 [3].

It appears that hypermail is reusing message IDs for some reason.  Or
picking them out of a hat.  Or an extremely poor hashing algorithm.

Actually, in reading a little bit more about Hypermail [4], it's
probably just a configuration problem.

[1] http://tinyurl.com/8odgysn
[2] http://lists.alpinelinux.org/alpine-devel/0094.html
[3] http://lists.alpinelinux.org/alpine-devel/0825.html
[4] http://www.hypermail-project.org/hypermail.html

Jeremy

On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Jeff Bilyk <jbilyk@gmail.com> wrote:
> I noticed the same a while back but ran out of time to investigate.
> Is there a specific offset that you noticed?  For example, 1944.HTML
> should really be loaded or such?
>
> Jeff
>
> On Aug 4, 2012, at 4:19 PM, Jeremy Thomerson <jeremy@thomersonfamily.com> wrote:
>
>> Does anyone know why all of the links that Google has for our mailing
>> lists link to the wrong thing?  I am assuming that we have rebuilt the
>> archives or something and their cache of the pages is old.  It seems
>> like we could/should do something to try to remedy this.
>>
>> Example: go to http://tinyurl.com/c23te2j (a Google search).  The
>> second link should probably be
>> http://lists.alpinelinux.org/alpine-devel/1945.html which on Google's
>> search results page says it is Re: [alpine-devel] autossh / SSH
>> Persistent Tunnel from Nathan ..., but in actuality it is Re:
>> [alpine-devel] kamailio kamctl script fixed for dbtext support.
>>
>> Jeremy
>>
>>
>> ---
>> Unsubscribe:  alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
>> Help:         alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
>> ---
>>


---
Unsubscribe:  alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help:         alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---
Natanael Copa <ncopa@alpinelinux.org>
Details
Message ID
<20120805115131.09aff63d@alpinelinux.org>
In-Reply-To
<CADVmKVDQ0RRmHpQLhKmv=m89pxkxEAbeKYM9g0ZeZeG_yj_Lbg@mail.gmail.com> (view parent)
Sender timestamp
1344160291
DKIM signature
missing
Download raw message
On Sat, 4 Aug 2012 15:18:43 -0500
Jeremy Thomerson <jeremy@thomersonfamily.com> wrote:

> Does anyone know why all of the links that Google has for our mailing
> lists link to the wrong thing?  I am assuming that we have rebuilt the
> archives or something and their cache of the pages is old.  It seems
> like we could/should do something to try to remedy this.

I have seen it too, but never taken the time to investigate why it
happens.

We should create a ticket for it on bugs.a.o

Thanks!

-nc


---
Unsubscribe:  alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help:         alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---
Kevin Chadwick <ma1l1ists@yahoo.co.uk>
Details
Message ID
<457603.24293.bm@smtp148.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To
<20120805115131.09aff63d@alpinelinux.org> (view parent)
Sender timestamp
1344169973
DKIM signature
missing
Download raw message
> > Does anyone know why all of the links that Google has for our mailing
> > lists link to the wrong thing?  I am assuming that we have rebuilt the
> > archives or something and their cache of the pages is old.  It seems
> > like we could/should do something to try to remedy this.  
> 
> I have seen it too, but never taken the time to investigate why it
> happens.
> 
> We should create a ticket for it on bugs.a.o
> 
> Thanks!

I suppose it's something else but if the content has somehow changed in
relation to the filenames without changing the date then maybe a simple
touch to change the date will get Google to re-index them. If content
stays static for a long time Google takes longer and longer to check
and may only check the timestamp.

-- 
_______________________________________________________________________

'Write programs that do one thing and do it well. Write programs to work
together. Write programs to handle text streams, because that is a
universal interface'

(Doug McIlroy)
_______________________________________________________________________


---
Unsubscribe:  alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help:         alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---
Reply to thread Export thread (mbox)