~alpine/devel

4 2

[alpine-devel] gcc-4.7.1 pushed to edge

Natanael Copa <ncopa@alpinelinux.org>
Details
Message ID
<20120910115710.0f68a883@ncopa-desktop.nor.wtbts.net>
Sender timestamp
1347271030
DKIM signature
missing
Download raw message
Hi,

Just a heads up that I have pushed gcc-4.7 to edge.

This should fix the need for the kernel hack:
export GCC_SPECS=/usr/share/gcc/hardenednopie.specs

I have disabled gcc-go for now, since it requires ucontext which we
don't have yet.

Please let me know if anything breaks.

Thanks!

-nc


---
Unsubscribe:  alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help:         alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---
Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Details
Message ID
<504DC364.5000109@citrix.com>
In-Reply-To
<20120910115710.0f68a883@ncopa-desktop.nor.wtbts.net> (view parent)
Sender timestamp
1347273572
DKIM signature
missing
Download raw message
Natanael Copa wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Just a heads up that I have pushed gcc-4.7 to edge.
> 
> This should fix the need for the kernel hack:
> export GCC_SPECS=/usr/share/gcc/hardenednopie.specs
> 
> I have disabled gcc-go for now, since it requires ucontext which we
> don't have yet.
> 
> Please let me know if anything breaks.

I haven't tried yet, but I've heard reports that gcc 4.7 breaks Xen
4.1.x. This should be fixed in 4.2, which I will import into edge once
released. I would like to be sure that 4.7 doesn't get pushed to main
until 4.1.x is replaced by 4.2.

Regards, Roger.





---
Unsubscribe:  alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help:         alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---
Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Details
Message ID
<504DF3C6.3070303@citrix.com>
In-Reply-To
<20120910160308.5c713688@ncopa-desktop.nor.wtbts.net> (view parent)
Sender timestamp
1347285958
DKIM signature
missing
Download raw message
Natanael Copa wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 11:39:32 +0100
> Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com> wrote:
> 
>> Natanael Copa wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Just a heads up that I have pushed gcc-4.7 to edge.
>>>
>>> This should fix the need for the kernel hack:
>>> export GCC_SPECS=/usr/share/gcc/hardenednopie.specs
>>>
>>> I have disabled gcc-go for now, since it requires ucontext which we
>>> don't have yet.
>>>
>>> Please let me know if anything breaks.
>> I haven't tried yet, but I've heard reports that gcc 4.7 breaks Xen
>> 4.1.x. This should be fixed in 4.2, which I will import into edge once
>> released. I would like to be sure that 4.7 doesn't get pushed to main
>> until 4.1.x is replaced by 4.2.
> 
> ugh... ok. I just pushed it...
> 
> How far away is xen-4.2? would it be an idea to start building the
> xen-4.2.0_rc* in edge? So we are sure they are included - and works - in
> alpine v2.5. To be released in november.

This rc will probably be the definitive one, so if you are ok with it I
will package it for Alpine. I will have to pick your Qemu patch ;). Will
try to submit the abuild later today.

Roger.


---
Unsubscribe:  alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help:         alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---
Natanael Copa <ncopa@alpinelinux.org>
Details
Message ID
<20120910160308.5c713688@ncopa-desktop.nor.wtbts.net>
In-Reply-To
<504DC364.5000109@citrix.com> (view parent)
Sender timestamp
1347285788
DKIM signature
missing
Download raw message
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 11:39:32 +0100
Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com> wrote:

> Natanael Copa wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Just a heads up that I have pushed gcc-4.7 to edge.
> > 
> > This should fix the need for the kernel hack:
> > export GCC_SPECS=/usr/share/gcc/hardenednopie.specs
> > 
> > I have disabled gcc-go for now, since it requires ucontext which we
> > don't have yet.
> > 
> > Please let me know if anything breaks.
> 
> I haven't tried yet, but I've heard reports that gcc 4.7 breaks Xen
> 4.1.x. This should be fixed in 4.2, which I will import into edge once
> released. I would like to be sure that 4.7 doesn't get pushed to main
> until 4.1.x is replaced by 4.2.

ugh... ok. I just pushed it...

How far away is xen-4.2? would it be an idea to start building the
xen-4.2.0_rc* in edge? So we are sure they are included - and works - in
alpine v2.5. To be released in november.

-nc


---
Unsubscribe:  alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help:         alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---
Natanael Copa <ncopa@alpinelinux.org>
Details
Message ID
<20120910164859.1b8704ff@ncopa-desktop.nor.wtbts.net>
In-Reply-To
<504DF3C6.3070303@citrix.com> (view parent)
Sender timestamp
1347288539
DKIM signature
missing
Download raw message
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 15:05:58 +0100
Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com> wrote:

> Natanael Copa wrote:
> > How far away is xen-4.2? would it be an idea to start building the
> > xen-4.2.0_rc* in edge? So we are sure they are included - and works
> > - in alpine v2.5. To be released in november.
> 
> This rc will probably be the definitive one, so if you are ok with it
> I will package it for Alpine. I will have to pick your Qemu patch ;).

Oh, yes i need follow that up too... too many loose ends...

> Will try to submit the abuild later today.

Sounds great!

Thanks!

-nc


---
Unsubscribe:  alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help:         alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---
Reply to thread Export thread (mbox)