~alpine/devel

2 2

[alpine-devel] Lua 5.3.0 (work1) now available

Details
Message ID
<1373077657.29901.140661252435181.444E2504@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Sender timestamp
1373077657
DKIM signature
missing
Download raw message
Huh, looks like Lua 5.3 isn't years and years away like I thought it
would be. Saw this on the lua-l list:

On Fri, Jul 5, 2013, at 10:22 PM, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo wrote:
> Lua 5.3.0 (work1) is now available for testing at
> 	http://www.lua.org/work/lua-5.3.0-work1.tar.gz
> 
> MD5     d4053ee55741eab5ecd7061326577586  -
> SHA1    ce71e80a24d1232f42d3afbdc1b034b0877f532b  -
> 
> This is a work version. An updated reference manual is included but
> all details may change in the final version.
> 
> The main change in Lua 5.3.0 is support for integers.
> 
> The complete diffs from Lua 5.2 are too extensive to show.
> 
> All feedback welcome. Thanks.
> --lhf
> 
-- 
dubiousjim@gmail.com



---
Unsubscribe:  alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help:         alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---
Bartłomiej Piotrowski <b@bpiotrowski.pl>
Details
Message ID
<51D7E951.50106@bpiotrowski.pl>
In-Reply-To
<1373077657.29901.140661252435181.444E2504@webmail.messagingengine.com> (view parent)
Sender timestamp
1373104465
DKIM signature
missing
Download raw message
On 2013-07-06 04:27, Jim Pryor wrote:
> Huh, looks like Lua 5.3 isn't years and years away like I thought it
> would be. Saw this on the lua-l list:
> 
> On Fri, Jul 5, 2013, at 10:22 PM, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo wrote:
>> Lua 5.3.0 (work1) is now available for testing at
>> 	http://www.lua.org/work/lua-5.3.0-work1.tar.gz
>>
>> MD5     d4053ee55741eab5ecd7061326577586  -
>> SHA1    ce71e80a24d1232f42d3afbdc1b034b0877f532b  -
>>
>> This is a work version. An updated reference manual is included but
>> all details may change in the final version.
>>
>> The main change in Lua 5.3.0 is support for integers.
>>
>> The complete diffs from Lua 5.2 are too extensive to show.
>>
>> All feedback welcome. Thanks.
>> --lhf
>>

There we go again… It seems to introduce enough changes to ship packages
named lua5.1, lua5.2 and lua (as Lua 5.3) in future, sigh.

-- 
Bartłomiej Piotrowski
http://bpiotrowski.pl/
Timo Teras <timo.teras@iki.fi>
Details
Message ID
<20130706125016.0295a375@vostro>
In-Reply-To
<1373077657.29901.140661252435181.444E2504@webmail.messagingengine.com> (view parent)
Sender timestamp
1373104216
DKIM signature
missing
Download raw message
On Fri, 05 Jul 2013 22:27:37 -0400
Jim Pryor <dubiousjim@gmail.com> wrote:

> Huh, looks like Lua 5.3 isn't years and years away like I thought it
> would be. Saw this on the lua-l list:

Yeah. But the more important question is, will it be backwards
incompatible or not. I think the integer support as-is does not
introduce incompatibilities.

If it's fully backwards compatible, we can just bump lua-5.2
immediately to 5.3 when it arrives.

- Timo


---
Unsubscribe:  alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help:         alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---
Reply to thread Export thread (mbox)