There's RC1 http://ua2.php.net/archive/2016.php#id2016-09-01-1
How this could be added to testing repo?
Maybe use *php71* as package name but what to do with executable's names?
The same question about /etc/php71
--
*Andy Postnikov*, drupal consultant
dgo.to/@andypost
skype:andypost2005
Well I think php7 is now in community repo, so php 7.1 could go into
testing?
Thank you,
Gennady
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Andy Postnikov <apostnikov@gmail.com>
wrote:
> There's RC1 http://ua2.php.net/archive/2016.php#id2016-09-01-1>> How this could be added to testing repo?> Maybe use *php71* as package name but what to do with executable's names?> The same question about /etc/php71>> --> *Andy Postnikov*, drupal consultant>> dgo.to/@andypost> skype:andypost2005>
Hey,
On 09/06/16 16:52, Andy Postnikov wrote:
> There's RC1 http://ua2.php.net/archive/2016.php#id2016-09-01-1>> How this could be added to testing repo?> Maybe use *php71* as package name but what to do with executable's names?
its a RC1 and not a stable release. I don't think its a good idea adding
unstable software to the aports. That would cause much confusin and
problems.
I am also against using a own php71 prefix for packages. PHP 7.1 is
simply a bugfix release für PHP 7 and people should upgrade to it. If we
keep packages around for every new release we will have shortly a huge
mess on our hands.
Greetings
Leo
---
Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---
Hi again)
PHP 7.1 is simply a bugfix release
I need to point that 7.1 is minor release with incompatibilities, see
http://php.net/manual/en/migration71.php
Both 5.6 and 7.0 has long support cycle
http://php.net/supported-versions.php
So why not to use testing repo for it's purpose for upcoming versions?
2016-09-07 11:00 GMT+03:00 Leo Unglaub <leo@leo-unglaub.net>:
> Hey,>> On 09/06/16 16:52, Andy Postnikov wrote:>>> There's RC1 http://ua2.php.net/archive/2016.php#id2016-09-01-1>>>> How this could be added to testing repo?>> Maybe use *php71* as package name but what to do with executable's names?>>>> its a RC1 and not a stable release. I don't think its a good idea adding> unstable software to the aports. That would cause much confusin and> problems.>> I am also against using a own php71 prefix for packages. PHP 7.1 is simply> a bugfix release für PHP 7 and people should upgrade to it. If we keep> packages around for every new release we will have shortly a huge mess on> our hands.>> Greetings> Leo>
--
*Andy Postnikov*, drupal consultant
dgo.to/@andypost
skype:andypost2005