Message-ID: <1485524143.11710.93.camel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [alpine-aports] [PATCH] testing/lablgtk: new aport
From: Leonardo Arena <rnalrd@gmail.com>
To: Jean-Louis Fuchs <ganwell@fangorn.ch>
Cc: alpine-aports@lists.alpinelinux.org
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 14:35:43 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20170125132547.GA8828@vimes.1042.ch>
References: <1485169970.11710.3.camel@gmail.com>
	 <20170124151536.4587-1-ganwell@fangorn.ch>
	 <1485348362.11710.63.camel@gmail.com> <20170125132547.GA8828@vimes.1042.ch>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-J1hKPvAdVg8DCw9E1C2R"
Precedence: list
Mime-Version: 1.0


--=-J1hKPvAdVg8DCw9E1C2R
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On mer, 2017-01-25 at 14:25 +0100, Jean-Louis Fuchs wrote:
> Hi |_eo
>=20
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 01:46:02PM +0100, Leonardo Arena wrote:
>=20
> I'm not familiar with ocaml, except for building unison.
>=20
> >=20
> > The dev stuff is ~5 MB, half of the package size (10MB).
> > I'm not familiar with ocaml. What would be the inconvenience in
> > having
> > a separate -dev pkg?
> If you do a native install you need lablgtk and lablgtk-dev. I
> thought
> it might lead to confusion. I think we have these options:
>=20
> 1. Have the dev split and develeopers just have to remember
> installing
> =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0both packages if they want to do a native-compile.
>=20
> 2. Add lablgtk to depends_dev, so if you intend to do a native-
> compile
> =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0you will automatically get lablgtk.
>=20
> 3. My current solution.
>=20
> I first wanted to go for 2. And then thought it might be considered a
> hack.
>=20
> >=20
> > Would a user just want to use it at run-time only
> > or it's an unlikely scenario?
> I guess a user never wants run-time only, since the distribution
> usually does a native-compile. For example the native-compile package
> of unison doesn't need lablgtk at run-time since its all linked into
> unison.
>=20
> But a ocaml developer probably wants run-time only, because he is
> using the interpreter during development.
>=20
> >=20
> > From Alpine packaging perspective only, 5 MB less in the system are
> > definitely worthy a pkg separation.
> So I guess we have to go for 1. or 2. let me know if 2. is ok.
>=20

Solution 2 sounds good to me.

I'm merged this patch and unison with this modification.

Thanks!

|_eo

--=-J1hKPvAdVg8DCw9E1C2R
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAABCAAGBQJYi0yvAAoJELAPckZGG2T6YlUH/jXsP/39sxQZdqZXwIiYF0RU
P/nfNthHhH8m/X6M2yYbJvlzEnOrxu3LbHh7UK7/f0pzPjliFM+fCpJ4MGT2mQIL
+VxNA/6NQrIsGibTGbrGRijPHdgtbA7QJIK/TXqg54BXpU4Wjx4/mrJcUlXoa7fU
b0NH0Cc/EVt/bz6mLewev8AVly5vsPloqfzhYh0khBWAwhgsjbyP6fp2rfoF0rUY
ZpiD4BTeucSeCbzRq7qdwwiFRLyIyiNZhs+dThZLWp9C4yKYQJhhsylnfYAQhH01
PzJhdfTLD1QLW0vFF9Lnu3Tn5KzfeYNfjlIHmNCeV2NXuR0Hvr8yjc/Pubi219U=
=p3Bz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-J1hKPvAdVg8DCw9E1C2R--



---
Unsubscribe:  alpine-aports+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help:         alpine-aports+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---