X-Original-To: alpine-aports@mail.alpinelinux.org Delivered-To: alpine-aports@mail.alpinelinux.org Received: from mail.alpinelinux.org (dallas-a1.alpinelinux.org [127.0.0.1]) by mail.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F6C4DC0298 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 16:49:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from no-spam.uk (st.ilet.to [31.193.133.175]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B69CFDC0270 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 16:49:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (st.ilet.to [local]) by st.ilet.to (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 927ec077; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 16:49:13 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 16:49:13 +0000 From: nicholas To: Isaac Dunham Cc: alpine-aports@lists.alpinelinux.org Subject: Re: [alpine-aports] [PATCH] testing/texlive: new aport Message-ID: <20160111164913.GA21261@st.ilet.to> References: <20160111151329.83BBCDC89ED@mail.alpinelinux.org> <20160111153115.GA11005@newbook> X-Mailinglist: alpine-aports Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160111153115.GA11005@newbook> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 07:31:16AM -0800, Isaac Dunham wrote: >On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 03:10:15PM +0000, ScrumpyJack wrote: >> Comprehensive TeX document production system >> http://tug.org/texlive/ > >It looks like you picked up my APKBUILD and didn't notice that TeX has >been moved to unmaintained, with pkgrel closer to 5. Aha, I thought the patch owner would chime up. Excellent. We'll put your name on it. The unmaintainedness of the old package is a bit of a saga. Have a look at #3920 #4514 #4969 and the irc logs for December if you have the time. In short, issues were closed, others opened ... and the package ended up in unmaintained. It isn't close to a working package and should have been deleted from testing. Your new APKBUILD, relayed by Mark Collin, built fine in edge after a very minor tweak, and Mark has tested it privately. >While I *don't* mind you picking it up (if you are willing to do so, >*please* do!), it would be best to either apply it to >unaintained/texlive or move unmaintained/texlive to testing while >applying most of the changes. I think we should delete the unmaintained package (built for #3920) and push this one to testing (built for #4969) >Also, I'm wondering if a package for xdvi would be better than building >and splitting xdvik (which would drop the Motif requirement). Be my guest :) Thanks for your all work on this on, there's been quite a bit of noise about it. --- Unsubscribe: alpine-aports+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-aports+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---