Subject: [alpine-aports] [PATCH 2/2] testing/radare2: back to GPLv3

From: Jose-Luis Rivas <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 22:05:09 -0500

The documentation on licensing in radare2 says there's a lot of GPL
plugins which we are distributing, the rest is LGPL and given the
virulent nature of the GPL they become GPL when it comes to distributing
them. So the safest thing to do is just leaving it as GPLv3.
---
 testing/radare2/APKBUILD | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/testing/radare2/APKBUILD b/testing/radare2/APKBUILD
index c751117..b7849ee 100644
--- a/testing/radare2/APKBUILD
+++ b/testing/radare2/APKBUILD
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ pkgrel=0
 pkgdesc="An opensource, crossplatform reverse engineering framework"
 url="http://www.radare.org"
 arch="all"
-license="LGPLv3"
+license="GPLv3"
 depends=""
 depends_dev=""
 makedepends="$depends_dev libzip-dev openssl-dev capstone-dev"
-- 
2.7.2

-- 
⨳ PGP 0x13EC43EEB9AC8C43 ⨳ https://ghostbar.co

---

From: Timo Teras <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 08:03:52 +0200

Hi,

I flattened this with the first patch, and applied. Thanks. Generally
non-intrusive changes we prefer to be bundled together.

I was meaning to reply to the earlier mail about the license issue,
but did not get to it yet. Sorry about that, we should've checked more
carefully it (that is read all of the upstream license text) before
applying that change.

On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 22:05:09 -0500
Jose-Luis Rivas <[email-masked]> wrote:

> virulent nature of the GPL they become GPL when it comes to
> distributing them. So the safest thing to do is just leaving it as
> GPLv3. ---

---

From: Jose-Luis Rivas <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 09:11:47 -0500

Thanks, since it's licensing I thought it could be bloody, so I prefered
not to hold back the upgrade on radare2 :-)

Will bundle it next time.