Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 15:07:32 +0200
From: Roland Kammerer <roland.kammerer@linbit.com>
To: alpine-aports@lists.alpinelinux.org
Subject: Re: [alpine-aports] [PATCH 2/2] testing/drbd9-grsec: upgrade to 9.0.2
Message-ID: <20160422130731.GU1371@rck.sh>
References: <1461273747-10283-1-git-send-email-roland.kammerer@linbit.com>
 <1461273747-10283-2-git-send-email-roland.kammerer@linbit.com>
 <20160422142444.358c4bd5@ncopa-desktop.alpinelinux.org>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160422142444.358c4bd5@ncopa-desktop.alpinelinux.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 02:24:44PM +0200, Natanael Copa wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 23:22:27 +0200
> Roland Kammerer <roland.kammerer@linbit.com> wrote:
> 
> > - New upstream release
> > - Changed download url
> > ---
> >  testing/drbd9-grsec/APKBUILD | 12 ++++++------
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> This and drbdmanage was applied. Thanks!
> 
> I am about to do a v3.4 release. I wonder if you think we can move
> drbd9-grsec and drbdmanage to main repository? can we expect upstream
> bug fixes for at least 6 months (if any) and upstram sec fixes for
> about 2 years?

Hi Natanael,

How is the policy for "main" and a given release? Maybe I missed it, but
at a first look I did not find a policy. Are version bumps allowed? If
so, what are the rules? Guess "no regressions" would be one ;-). Or is
it more like Debian stable where the version is pinned and only fixup
patches are allowed?

Regards, rck


---
Unsubscribe:  alpine-aports+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help:         alpine-aports+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---