X-Original-To: alpine-aports@lists.alpinelinux.org Received: from mail.cmpwn.com (mail.cmpwn.com [45.56.77.53]) by lists.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49F88F84F65 for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2019 20:01:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=cmpwn.com; s=cmpwn; t=1552680196; bh=4flxQ+a7zZCchREFGepYcNbwbA+OUQlUxleSvaaVp30=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=4Udzo1qSZC4mjv3ZUB5O6FErypaj4fuklCijTcNrRGb4A+qAlGmIM+WulJqgsD7FO qy/K8kUZ+IRLcOXgOPxlD/g2py5FneDHUM9SyHgeHAN6sP9LhACRFS6hUL3rnSVl1s 6/kemIzq6V2tUjx5gjHPqcZGjMjvI3F4ukUmFNnE= Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 16:01:24 -0400 From: Drew DeVault To: Kevin Daudt Cc: alpine-aports@lists.alpinelinux.org, Ivan Tham Subject: Re: [alpine-aports] [PATCHv3] testing/ubase: update to 20171010 Message-ID: <20190315200124.GC16498@homura.localdomain> References: <20180115040029.21669-1-sir@cmpwn.com> <20190315195217.GA4397@alpha> X-Mailinglist: alpine-aports Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190315195217.GA4397@alpha> X-GNU: Terry Pratchett Thanks for the review! I see a lot of problems in this patch myself (it's over a year old now), I should revisit it anyway. On 2019-03-15 8:52 PM, Kevin Daudt wrote: > Just running the binary with -v or -h is not accepted as a check. In > that case it's prefered to leave `options="!check"`. I have heard the opposite in the past. Can you update this page? https://wiki.alpinelinux.org/wiki/Creating_an_Alpine_package#Code_review --- Unsubscribe: alpine-aports+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-aports+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---