X-Original-To: alpine-aports@lists.alpinelinux.org Received: from mail.cmpwn.com (mail.cmpwn.com [45.56.77.53]) by lists.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0198DF83227 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 01:57:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=cmpwn.com; s=cmpwn; t=1553479164; bh=X0Eb2u/9gp9BOUKNSbmcUaTHKMtm1omRIHezaLPKc5s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To; b=lqd8TtHDb+fTp+qx2u9tz3LfhDkSn2JXWJYwL6TIXFOoJ6R0pnb9H9j9hAzTAZcpj kaqAqBqZ4JWuLu+QUUC3VPhI5RYph9n1JlhSA/CyVs8bl+XZyhFDCNeXZpGUfufcAu NlVuIIeEiWlljvNN5+Y1rexeaHZGOIZa4bReW4QU= Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 21:57:01 -0400 From: Drew DeVault To: Michael Forney Cc: alpine-aports@lists.alpinelinux.org Subject: [alpine-aports] Re: [PATCH 1/2] testing/samurai: remove check() Message-ID: <20190325015701.GF1173@homura.localdomain> X-Mailinglist: alpine-aports Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190318070509.21398-1-mforney@mforney.org> X-GNU: Terry Pratchett Sorry I missed this - can you Cc me on future patches? +1 on patch 2/2 > There is no provided test suite. The `build.ninja` is meant to be an > alternative build mechanism and requires modification to set desired > compile and link flags. > > So, running `./samu` in check() will rebuild itself before packaging, > but without the CFLAGS and LDFLAGS set by abuild, resulting in an > unoptimized binary. Hm, I understand the problem, but having samu build itself seems like a pretty good test. I'd rather fix the CFLAGS/LDFLAGS than nix the check() entirely. Testing a full gcc bootstrap involves a similar process. Thoughts? --- Unsubscribe: alpine-aports+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-aports+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---