On 2021-07-11 12:49:39 -0000, Andy Postnikov wrote:
> needs bump pkgrel
I can send v2 but out of curiosity why? It is the exact same source code
so there should be no need to rebuild.
W.
--
There are only two hard things in Computer Science:
cache invalidation, naming things and off-by-one errors.
Wolf <wolf@wolfsden.cz> replied via email:
```
On 2021-07-11 12:49:39 -0000, Andy Postnikov wrote:
> needs bump pkgrel
I can send v2 but out of curiosity why? It is the exact same source code
so there should be no need to rebuild.
W.
--
There are only two hard things in Computer Science:
cache invalidation, naming things and off-by-one errors.
```
--
via https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/aports/-/merge_requests/23024#note_167636
On 2021-07-11 18:31:32 -0000, Dylan Van Assche wrote:
> Without a `pkgrel` bump, the builders won't pick it up :)
My point was that I do not think that they have to pick it up since
nothing was actually changed, it is still the same version. So I thought
that rebuild would be just waste of computer time. But v2 was sent which
includes the pkgrel bump, maybe it's cleaner this way.
W.
--
There are only two hard things in Computer Science:
cache invalidation, naming things and off-by-one errors.
Wolf <wolf@wolfsden.cz> replied via email:
```
On 2021-07-11 18:31:32 -0000, Dylan Van Assche wrote:
> Without a `pkgrel` bump, the builders won't pick it up :)
My point was that I do not think that they have to pick it up since
nothing was actually changed, it is still the same version. So I thought
that rebuild would be just waste of computer time. But v2 was sent which
includes the pkgrel bump, maybe it's cleaner this way.
W.
--
There are only two hard things in Computer Science:
cache invalidation, naming things and off-by-one errors.
```
--
via https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/aports/-/merge_requests/23024#note_167685