Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: zsolt@meszarovics.name
In-Reply-To: <20160322123847.41ff026e@ncopa-desktop.alpinelinux.org>
References: <1457874706-2957-1-git-send-email-zsolt@meszarovics.me>
	<20160322123847.41ff026e@ncopa-desktop.alpinelinux.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 12:45:32 +0100
Message-ID: <CAMKfJRWvHvhs52aytTiG+rZr_vXZPVOTYCcqhO72J5c-yB=AVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [alpine-aports] [PATCH] testing/mhddfs: new aport
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Zsolt_M=C3=A9sz=C3=A1rovics?= <zsolt@meszarovics.me>
To: Natanael Copa <ncopa@alpinelinux.org>
Cc: Zsolt M <zsolt@meszarovics.me>, alpine-aports@lists.alpinelinux.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Yes, mhddfs depends on it. It's just a set of header files, a set of
macros, no .so or anything like that, so I thought it's acceptable
like this, but I'm happy to create an uthash-dev or similar, if that's
preferred.

On 22 March 2016 at 12:38, Natanael Copa <ncopa@alpinelinux.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 13:11:46 +0000
> Zsolt M <zsolt@meszarovics.me> wrote:
>
>> http://mhddfs.uvw.ru/
>> A fuse-based file system for unifying several mount points into one.
> ...
>> +_uthashver=1.9.9
>> +source="http://mhddfs.uvw.ru/downloads/${pkgname}_${pkgver}.tar.gz
>> +        saveas-https://github.com/troydhanson/uthash/archive/v${_uthashver}.tar.gz/uthash-v${_uthashver}.tar.gz
>> +        local-uthash.patch"
>
> Is uthash relly needed?
>
> Why don't we ship uthash as separate package?
>
> -nc


---
Unsubscribe:  alpine-aports+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help:         alpine-aports+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---