X-Original-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Delivered-To: alpine-devel@mail.alpinelinux.org Received: from mail-yh0-f50.google.com (mail-yh0-f50.google.com [209.85.213.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2182EDC00A8 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 17:29:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yh0-f50.google.com with SMTP id t59so19058414yho.9 for ; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 09:29:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=YhNIDiHhfhv4HZTvnjj7TX1Cg1Smo4X8jDtdjlqUF9Q=; b=RCN2Q5jxmqAPmfyW68+83XIS3ZcstJ39qPXymFy+PQBHMUZ8RjjlZNvFSVlvqRHFY9 F5Usr/hX5IzG8c/jDC/7UAsJkMPCn5aoUqZs/VhGVrbeRCkTxCzuXsdAtymIlN9J3kW5 CZ4HkEoe76SQgj2lzIeSOEgLNhXmhH8NLwOYScKDrEg1lFtTPTgFRLpQInU1estY3COT DcDKtBfBrUs2TDWtG1nmuwUhAS5hcnZFf1ICZNzIKgDzKSdXVcbw9+TlXU49e1HgnDAX Our1jwnElm8TooOqE4T5+URMDhygK+iqp8yxrjvBKLzS84sGu9Gugi5YHRKUIF2Ippb2 XsFw== X-Received: by 10.236.65.227 with SMTP id f63mr8004568yhd.4.1422984573540; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 09:29:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2002:4b80:46c::24df:7828:8c1e:1495? ([2002:4b80:46c:0:24df:7828:8c1e:1495]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id r63sm14618083yho.8.2015.02.03.09.29.32 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 03 Feb 2015 09:29:32 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\)) Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] openssl-1.0.2 or libressl ? From: systmkor In-Reply-To: <20150203192523.247fbf53@vostro> Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 09:29:31 -0800 Cc: Alpine-devel Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <0A02C80E-3B17-41DE-8822-250D7C0DC2E1@gmail.com> References: <20150203192523.247fbf53@vostro> To: Timo Teras X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6) > So I'm wondering should we reconsider libressl at this point? Any > thoughts? My vote is that we stick with openssl for version 1.0.2 but start the = process to move to libressl. Even if we don=E2=80=99t move to it = officially, it would be nice as an alternative. --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---