MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 15:03:36 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: "Ariadne Conill" <ariadne@dereferenced.org>
Message-ID: <11a76af7b6dc9c035956d4ade615d489@dereferenced.org>
Subject: Re: Python 2
To: "Natanael Copa" <ncopa@alpinelinux.org>
Cc: ~alpine/devel@lists.alpinelinux.org
In-Reply-To: <20200124155225.041d232c@ncopa-desktop.copa.dup.pw>
References: <20200124155225.041d232c@ncopa-desktop.copa.dup.pw>
 <5e69d1161d631788873e8e5d3cf0d5e5@dereferenced.org>

Hello,=0A=0AJanuary 24, 2020 8:52 AM, "Natanael Copa" <ncopa@alpinelinux.=
org> wrote:=0A=0A> On Fri, 24 Jan 2020 14:48:44 +0000=0A> "Ariadne Conill=
" <ariadne@dereferenced.org> wrote:=0A> =0A>> Hello,=0A>> =0A>> As we kno=
w, Python 2.7 will be EOL in April, which will be=0A>> around the same ti=
me that Alpine 3.12 is branched.=0A>> =0A>> Should we begin removing Pyth=
on 2 in edge, or do we want to=0A>> continue supporting it for 3.12?=0A>>=
 =0A>> Ariadne=0A> =0A> Would be good if we could remove it and Leo has d=
one some good work in=0A> that direction.=0A> =0A> Not sure what the bloc=
kers for that is.=0A=0AI think we should identify the blockers and work t=
hem.  It=0Awould be nice to drop Python 2 in 3.12.=0A=0AAriadne