DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date
         :message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=o418G7vk6lzwxu/mqocFoYtmOCBlvW+e4P81H+lFAH3A0E3Bl0haJcaiLczQUFmECb
         +blaRN6tBdpy7SFKd6cU7RWohUBaaAI7FGod9LFfNckQFrPnZRUu3LLr3wl98SxY0pyx
         6sjFCaxgPXoq7sYELZBWQOPNh+E8jm2wfcryQ=
Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] rename the APKBUILDs
From: Natanael Copa <natanael.copa@gmail.com>
To: Timo =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ter=E4s?= <timo.teras@iki.fi>
Cc: Alpine-devel <alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org>
In-Reply-To: <4975AB80.9020902@iki.fi>
References: <1232447481.1947.52.camel@nc>  <4975AB80.9020902@iki.fi>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:00:39 +0100
Message-Id: <1232636439.3880.6.camel@nc>
Precedence: list
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 12:46 +0200, Timo Ter=E4s wrote:
> Natanael Copa wrote:
> > You might have seen patches with new "aports" for new build tree on this
> > list and there will come more of that.
> >=20
> > I would like to rename the APKBUILD to soemthing with .sh extension to
> > get the syntax higlight from vim. APKBUILD is also kinda hard to type
> > fast too.
> >=20
> > So I would like to ask everyone: Ok if i break the entire tree (again)
> > and rename all APKBUILD to ABUILD.sh?
> >=20
> > Is this name ok for everyone? We coudl use small letters to: abuild.sh
> > but its nice when the abuild are clearly different the the rest of the
> > files in a dir listing.
>=20
> It is not a shell script to be ran as-is, instead it's something used
> by abuild, so I'd rather not have it .sh extension. Otherwise it's
> confusing.

ok. yes. i was thinking that they are shell include files. Sometimes you
find php include files called .php. but yes... will most likely confuse.

> How about adding #! line at start, usually editors recognize those
> and can give syntax highlighting with those.=20

this is actually pretty cool, but im not really sure how to implement
that without writing a small C wrapper.

I think it is simpler to source them like we do today.

> Or add an editor specific
> configuration option to auto highlight files that are named APKBUILD.

Carlo found some fancy vim line that would turn on syntax highlight so
that part is working now.

> I'm not all against renaming them. But syntax highlighting is not a
> good reason for that, IMHO.

How about rename them to ABUILD? shorter to type, better connection to
the 'abuild' script and package. Is it worth it at this stage?

-nc




---
Unsubscribe:  alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help:         alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---