Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] Unattended Installation Ideas for 2.1

From: "Matt Smith" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 20:52:15 -0500 (CDT)

On Thursday, August 26, 2010 8:16am, "Natanael Copa" <[email-masked]> said:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Matt Smith <[email-masked]> wrote:
>> Yeah, the lua-pty option sounds pretty light-weight, as does "empty."
>>
>> I'm open to using either option, but I'm thinking "empty" might be a better fit?
> 
> I'm ok with both. Depends on if you want do it with shell scripts or lua.

Honestly though, I would think most people would come more to knowing how to write a shell script than one in lua.  Add to that, empty would be more shell-friendly.

However, what if both options were available to the user, and then they could:
- Use Lua + lua-pty exclusively.
- Use shell scripts + empty exclusively.
- Or mix and match.

- Matt Smith

---
Unsubscribe:  [email-masked]
Help:         [email-masked]
---