X-Original-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Delivered-To: alpine-devel@mail.alpinelinux.org Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B457DC0136 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 20:36:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.42]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 072F221262 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:36:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web4.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.214]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:36:11 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:from:to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:subject:date:in-reply-to :references; s=smtpout; bh=HkYln6l0sdISd0teV67AbTECzGU=; b=ot2LE ml2tFtBsIHhTbyc2xkWIinAZZf4iHjjZykL4Y2FVBxVUhGCyMRjJyAFx/KgMd0ee PJgpxdMjRUPXpAe4gpHBIW8yua2EYjoDg2EPFxcC//ToqqLYYv1l7PtxQNPyYDi/ 1BdZ4L4FF7Qh9SMsAZLgEOeUN//HbSTHl79L60= Received: by web4.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix, from userid 99) id D631F3C1F34; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:36:10 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1332794170.17305.140661054378689.7D3F03D5@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: QWEU42qRK5x8kROPDyQhIXxQVgLEjM5AehBXGP4wYkg2 1332794170 From: Dubiousjim To: Alpine devel X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] Questions about doing a glibc-based build Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:36:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20120326195349.GA1089@waltdnes.org> References: <20120325211042.GA29428@waltdnes.org> <1332710453.21718.140661053914881.0D2AE04A@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20120326195349.GA1089@waltdnes.org> > Alpine looks like it could be a functional, lightweight, mdev-based, > end-user distro if only glibc could be dropped in in place of uclibc. > > I have one more question. Is Alpine source-based or binary? > According to > http://wiki.alpinelinux.org/wiki/Comparison_with_Gentoo_and_Debian > > > Note that Gentoo is source based, just like ports in FreeBSD is while > > Debian uses pre-compiled binaries. Alpine is compiled using Gentoo > > portage but Alpine itself uses its own apk-tools binary package that > > are more similar FreeBSD's binary packages. > > That's rather vague, and I'd like an English translation . It's also out-of-date. Alpine used to be build in a Gentoo build environment, but nowadays that's no longer done; Alpine is built in an Alpine environment. The source-based/binary-based contrast isn't so sharply applicable here. I haven't used Gentoo but my understanding is that it's a source-based distro in the classic sense. Alpine is more of a hybrid, like Arch and FreeBSD are: binary packages are available, but it's also very easy to build one or all packages from source. The package tree is kept in git; so you can keep your personal modifications in local branches. Building from source and dealing with git aren't necessary; if you want, you can just stick to the pre-built binary packages. I used Arch and FreeBSD for a long time but was hankering after a distro with just Alpine characteristics. But if you're set on glibc, it sounds to me like you might have an easier time getting Arch to work the way you want. --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---