X-Original-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org
Delivered-To: alpine-devel@mail.alpinelinux.org
Received: from mail-wg0-f46.google.com (mail-wg0-f46.google.com [74.125.82.46])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C025DC022F
	for <alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org>; Sat, 13 Sep 2014 20:44:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id n12so2244429wgh.29
        for <alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org>; Sat, 13 Sep 2014 13:44:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references
         :content-type:mime-version;
        bh=Dm35Ugl+Sc8x6bZzK5x4XC0poxf17m80sCvGIaWbOvo=;
        b=BlOsglwgH08quFrsXJFsA6c0IzUTy+39gnJjNwfZOdRXoqOu0PKTUyg6zkjr8vG2YG
         ETJ+uS1JcdyFP5o0T0q/c2B3k6UWPdtGW/nbT0WBfQeS3scpPPCp0XVM8O/Yo9RbOI/2
         ydk6YgJYTIiyX2W/i8Dz2JKfX4GEGzZGfsvlLKiLQK5mBWRAk6fBQY/D4uUtg4K2lbxd
         +61+6symO4W9NSbKJzf0zHH0TrRyZxukVfU0cGeV8eZSqLbwP+0A/miQnwxn8Cfafgyr
         DHzC7aAV0Iajg3DArwpPOXsQSElRPOyFbMiFMinj9s0JqXE8sYgxTNCDX2JTYpuq8A1d
         vh/Q==
X-Received: by 10.194.63.37 with SMTP id d5mr16599791wjs.92.1410641047607;
        Sat, 13 Sep 2014 13:44:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.103] (93-57-120-175.ip164.fastwebnet.it. [93.57.120.175])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id bk6sm8874182wjb.26.2014.09.13.13.44.05
        for <multiple recipients>
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Sat, 13 Sep 2014 13:44:06 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <1410641040.11289.1.camel@c89m3s1>
Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] considering packaging another mailx
From: Leonardo Arena <rnalrd@gmail.com>
To: Isaac Dunham <ibid.ag@gmail.com>
Cc: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 22:44:00 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20140913203317.GA5578@newbook>
References: <20140913203317.GA5578@newbook>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-rz55kmAqmGxNFNCq8c6Y"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu2 
X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel
Precedence: list
List-Id: Alpine Development <alpine-devel.lists.alpinelinux.org>
List-Unsubscribe: 
	<mailto:alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: 
	<mailto:alpine-devel+subscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org?subject=subscribe>
Mime-Version: 1.0


--=-rz55kmAqmGxNFNCq8c6Y
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Il giorno sab, 13/09/2014 alle 13.33 -0700, Isaac Dunham ha scritto:

[snip]

> I'm inclined to think that in the short term, heirloom-mailx would be
> a significant improvement over our current main/mailx.
>=20
> What I'd like to do is add testing/heirloom-mailx providing mailx;
> I have a preliminary aport without the provides part.
> In the future, upgrading to s-nail seems like a logical path; but
> I think that using s-nail now might be hasty.

I'm a mailx user and I 100% agree with your proposed plan.

Thanks!

- leo

--=-rz55kmAqmGxNFNCq8c6Y
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAABAgAGBQJUFKyQAAoJELAPckZGG2T6ht8H/13NaUJCY9difhu+yxVKeItJ
wyk00gYvBYnbIhGW1X1liVDXifcrT8MK/Al+/D6pDkUrWsQe/H5JF3VlwLaXohQ2
fpZimeDD47P/+qS4uvezDLY9T4DHkRCkJJUG8Fdg49t3nuM5Ss0PaPQqfwV66fS7
1QLiB9zoQn/KvvYwzniuS7IO8zAyMWYRy1rKKnaJjBb0Bd2H/OiPRHul36i7/Woe
46zDF/0A5dSgGuc9u2Gqy3YlB45THCMCH7cC24WC/UkSMwFqA+IpW8p8gk3MwS3+
9AennIAVgQ2ZWfwiZHz7kebyxnfT9DIH16e+V5Jm+TjrKd8G0X88nRwx2FJVoIQ=
=CdyD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-rz55kmAqmGxNFNCq8c6Y--



---
Unsubscribe:  alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help:         alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---