X-Original-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Delivered-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Received: from smtp.renta.net (smtp.renta.net [203.25.238.7]) by lists.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 683D71EBFF8 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:50:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop.localnet ([::ffff:60.240.81.28]) (AUTH: LOGIN markc@renta.net, SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by smtp.renta.net with esmtp; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 01:50:40 +1000 id 0001809E.4D94A2D5.00003E9E From: Mark Constable To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] Why? ACF - million repos Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 01:50:33 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.38-ARCH; KDE/4.6.1; x86_64; ; ) References: <4D94795D.7040206@iki.fi> <20110331165637.58c54e83@ncopa-desktop.nor.wtbts.net> In-Reply-To: <20110331165637.58c54e83@ncopa-desktop.nor.wtbts.net> X-Face: jlj909-)]3bzyXbyQ6wU,`" =?iso-8859-1?q?=24=258lN4VHKs=7D=2EQG=3Bn*=7B-O+rIi=25u=7BsZ!qIBs=0A=09eh?= =?iso-8859-1?q?T=3D=26Jo=23FVk?="s~%gGl4E/LX?K/PE;WZep|IbZY"S}a>:~ik}ul0b#A|j#=9VsOP) =?iso-8859-1?q?Jq=3D6=26b=0A=094=7E6-vb=24e0f=60?="ky/7E>N4O!`;ij![IpU$ZpuZ!{"bnyN3yNpw@.7cw!889#4, =?iso-8859-1?q?zZ0S=3FyDb!=3A=0A=09Yil6QADQ=5E=60?= List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201104010150.33799.markc@renta.net> On 01/04/11, Natanael Copa wrote: > I'd rather have 52 separate APKBUILDs using same source > package than having 1 APKBUILD with 52 different subpackages > with different version numbers. Why not have a single meta repo, ie; acf-all, that has a single APKBUILD with it's own version number and the build() does a git submodule pull on all the other separate acf modules and packs them all up into a single package. --markc --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---