X-Original-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Delivered-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Received: from mail.wtbts.no (mail.wtbts.no [213.234.126.131]) by lists.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 872811EBFC9 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2011 06:07:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (bsna.nor.wtbts.net [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wtbts.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1643AE4002; Fri, 8 Apr 2011 06:07:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Yes Received: from mail.wtbts.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bsna.nor.wtbts.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MLnSiLu2SFNN; Fri, 8 Apr 2011 06:07:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ytre.org (extmail.nor.wtbts.net [10.65.72.14]) by mail.wtbts.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9824AE4001; Fri, 8 Apr 2011 06:07:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ytre.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ytre.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70A75621C1D1E; Fri, 8 Apr 2011 06:07:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncopa-desktop.nor.wtbts.net (unknown [10.65.65.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ncopa@ytre.org) by mail.ytre.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 17B90621C1D1C; Fri, 8 Apr 2011 06:07:02 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 08:04:37 +0200 From: Natanael Copa To: Ted Trask Cc: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] new edge snapshot and upcoming feature freeze Message-ID: <20110408080437.559e3cb9@ncopa-desktop.nor.wtbts.net> In-Reply-To: <105535.65649.qm@web130107.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <20110407213938.57301ae5@alpinelinux.org> <105535.65649.qm@web130107.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.24.0; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 13:45:06 -0700 (PDT) Ted Trask wrote: > Will use of LVM be required? Will it be possible to get the exact > same install that you used to get from 'setup-disk -r'? Is there a need for that? I was thinking of it, but from script programming perspective, its so much more complicated to work with partitions than LVM. You can also resize/re-organize the partitions later. I could ofcourse keep the current code (which is one big bulk) in there but it would be nice to The current plan is that 'setup-disk -r' and selecting 'root' will create 2 partitions, 1 boot, 1 for lvm and store the root and swap (if any) on lvm. I wonder if we should have a simplified disk layout too, no LVM, no swap, no /boot, just /. This could be useful for ssd setups. Oh, btw, what I think would be cool would be if you could run setup-disk with 2 or more disks and it would automatically do the raid magic for you. For example: setup-disk /dev/sdb /dev/sdc > > Ted > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Natanael Copa > To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org > Sent: Thu, April 7, 2011 3:39:38 PM > Subject: [alpine-devel] new edge snapshot and upcoming feature freeze > > Hi, > > I have tagged a new edge snapshot, 110407. This includes apk-tools-2.1 > so things should works as normal when setting up new boxes, without > any apk-tools upgrade adventures. > > This snapshot also has a new version of setup-disk with support for > data-only disk setups. You first get asked if you want use disk at > all, and if so, which disk. Then you get asked how you would like to > use it and you basically have 2 options: > * data-only (hybrid) install > * traditional native disk install > > data-only disk will set up the disk with swap and one big /var using > LVM. You can manually set swap size with -s option or disable it swap > by setting the size to 0. If you run setup-disk with -r option, it > will create a raid1 device under LVM with a single disk so you later > can append a disk for redundancy. > > Native disk install might have some issues at the moment and I intend > to rewrite it to also use LVM. > > setup-disk now uses ext4 by default. > > Please test it and give feedback. > > I think we will enter feature freeze mode tomorrow. From next week we > will focus on bug fixing and setting up a 2.2-stable build box. If > there still are any packages in testing that you need for 2.2 stable, > well, too bad... > > -nc > > > --- > Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org > Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org > --- --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---