X-Original-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Delivered-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Received: from mail.wtbts.no (mail.wtbts.no [213.234.126.131]) by lists.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E4CB1EBFD2 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2011 14:34:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (bsna.nor.wtbts.net [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wtbts.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AC42AE4002; Fri, 8 Apr 2011 14:34:09 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Yes Received: from mail.wtbts.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bsna.nor.wtbts.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k53gvJ4RdpG8; Fri, 8 Apr 2011 14:34:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ytre.org (extmail.nor.wtbts.net [10.65.72.14]) by mail.wtbts.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0FB9AE4001; Fri, 8 Apr 2011 14:34:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ytre.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ytre.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F499621C1D25; Fri, 8 Apr 2011 14:34:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncopa-desktop.nor.wtbts.net (unknown [10.65.65.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ncopa@ytre.org) by mail.ytre.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1FA97621C1D24; Fri, 8 Apr 2011 14:34:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 16:31:40 +0200 From: Natanael Copa To: Ted Trask Cc: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] new edge snapshot and upcoming feature freeze Message-ID: <20110408163140.11929622@ncopa-desktop.nor.wtbts.net> In-Reply-To: <390487.78110.qm@web130103.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <20110407213938.57301ae5@alpinelinux.org> <105535.65649.qm@web130107.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20110408080437.559e3cb9@ncopa-desktop.nor.wtbts.net> <390487.78110.qm@web130103.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.24.0; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 05:38:24 -0700 (PDT) Ted Trask wrote: > Needed? Maybe not. But I did think it was a nice simple sollution. > LVM adds an extra layer of complication. However, I no longer use > setup-disk in any of my applications, and have moved back to > run-from-RAM and lbu. So, as usual, I will trust your judgement. Ok, I think I will make that possible at some point. I is just a bit complicated to write a script that can support with/without swap without LVM (i'm lazy...) Is there any need for non-LVM for data-only disk? I suppose it is. I think I will disable LVM by default but let users enable it with -L. sigh... -nc --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---