X-Original-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Delivered-To: alpine-devel@mail.alpinelinux.org Received: from mail.wtbts.no (mail.wtbts.no [213.234.126.131]) by mail.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C55D915C8D96 for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 06:25:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (bsna.nor.wtbts.net [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wtbts.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86B86AE4002; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 06:25:54 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Yes Received: from mail.wtbts.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bsna.nor.wtbts.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ei7Vl+Fue9Pq; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 06:25:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ytre.org (extmail.nor.wtbts.net [10.65.72.14]) by mail.wtbts.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A827AE4001; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 06:25:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ytre.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ytre.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0272560AF7747; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 06:25:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncopa-desktop.nor.wtbts.net (ncopa-desktop.nor.wtbts.net [10.65.65.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ncopa@ytre.org) by mail.ytre.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A639E60AF7746; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 06:25:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 08:21:00 +0200 From: Natanael Copa To: Paul Onyschuk Cc: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] [RFC] package name policy change Message-ID: <20110707082100.72cc9439@ncopa-desktop.nor.wtbts.net> In-Reply-To: <20110706223413.b0e851f9.blink@bojary.koba.pl> References: <20110706204225.148b1b52@alpinelinux.org> <20110706223413.b0e851f9.blink@bojary.koba.pl> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.24.5; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP On Wed, 6 Jul 2011 22:34:13 +0200 Paul Onyschuk wrote: > On Wed, 6 Jul 2011 20:42:25 +0200 > Natanael Copa wrote: > > > > > Other comments? > > > > What naming for those packages you suggest? For C++ related things > using "pp" is pretty obvious (e.g. libgc++ -> libgcpp). And simple > "+" should be changed to plus (e.g. gtk+ -> gtkplus)? What does in mean in practice. Good point. I'm looking to what others do. Seems like debian/ubuntu allows + in the name. Fedora too (so i assume all rpm based allows it). The approx list is (-dev and -doc excluded): libgc++ g++ libstdc++ gtk+ gtk+2.0 gtk+3.0 imagemagick-c++ libsigc++ tolua++ uclibc++ renaming g++ -> gpp will not work since there are another gpp (http://en.nothingisreal.com/wiki/GPP) libstdcpp is just ugly libstdcplusplus too. gtk+ -> gtk works gtk+2.0 -> gtk2 works gtk+3.0 -> gtk3 works imagemagick-c++ -> imagemagic-cpp might work libsigcpp -> libsigcpp is ugly libsigcplusplus too. tolua++ -> toluapp wont work. toluaplusplus is even worse. uclibc++ can be removed. hum... maybe it was not a good idea after all? > +1 (my vote probably doesn't count anyway, I'm just sharing my > opinion). Packages with wird naming aren't popular, so it should be > easy to fix and maintain. Things like libstdc++ and imagemagick-c++ makes more sense than the alternatives somehow. Unless someone comes up with some good alternative to the above list I think we'll just keep it as it is and will have to urlencode when needed. How about we allow + and disallow the others? The will something like this work: encoded_url=${url//+/%2B} -nc --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---