X-Original-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Delivered-To: alpine-devel@mail.alpinelinux.org Received: from mail.wtbts.no (mail.wtbts.no [213.234.126.131]) by mail.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12569181176B for ; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 06:16:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (bsna.nor.wtbts.net [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wtbts.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E764AE4001; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 06:16:24 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Yes Received: from mail.wtbts.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bsna.nor.wtbts.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A1utDlZKtf6y; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 06:16:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ytre.org (extmail.nor.wtbts.net [10.65.72.14]) by mail.wtbts.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD9BA376277; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 06:16:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ytre.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ytre.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D62260AF56E3; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 06:16:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncopa-desktop.nor.wtbts.net (ncopa-desktop.nor.wtbts.net [10.65.65.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ncopa@ytre.org) by mail.ytre.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1CA5A60AB3D05; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 06:16:20 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 08:16:20 +0200 From: Natanael Copa To: "Walter Dnes" Cc: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] Can Alpine be built with glibc and mdev? Message-ID: <20111003081620.31076cc7@ncopa-desktop.nor.wtbts.net> In-Reply-To: <20111003032414.GA27587@waltdnes.org> References: <20111003032414.GA27587@waltdnes.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.5; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP On Sun, 2 Oct 2011 23:24:14 -0400 "Walter Dnes" wrote: > No, I'm not proposing a fork of Alpine. There are a bunch of > unhappy people on the Gentoo-Users list, over the fact that the lead > developer for udev wants to put a whole bunch of userspace stuff into > the boot process, which forces either merging /usr into the / > physical volume, or else booting with initramfs, which is more stuff > to go wrong, and very painful to debug when it does go wrong. The > udev lead developer is a Redhat employee. The attitude is summarized > very well at... > http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/separate-usr-is-broken?highlight=%28%5C/usr%29 > where the poster says, and I quote... > > > On my fresh Fedora 15 install that's 23 obvious cases. > > Just because he uses big bloated Redhat doesn't mean everybody else > wants to. > > I understand that standard Alpine uses uclibc, which breaks > proprietary stuff like Nvidia video drivers and Flash, and who knows > what else. Like I said, I'm not looking to fork Alpine, but I wonder > if it can be used as a template for Gentoo with mdev instead of > udev. It is possible to build alpine with glibc/eglibc and I dont think that would be too hard to do. We do not have the manpower to maintain both eglibc and uclibc atm. Alpine Linux and Gentoo have openrc in common so you could probably just use the Alpine Linux's mdev scripts. I would say that the main problem you have with a non-udev gentoo is that xorg and much desktop stuff depends on libudev to work properly, so an Alpine Linux desktop uses udev as well. > I am not a programmer, but I can... > > ./configure --with-various-options && make && install > > Using Gentoo, I've become familiar with "make menuconfig", so I'm > willing to take a crack at it. If it's promising, I'll submit it to > the Gentoo dev list as a potential way around the udev mess. I don't really see how Alpine Linux would help you around the udev mess. -nc --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---