X-Original-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Delivered-To: alpine-devel@mail.alpinelinux.org Received: from ironport2-out.pppoe.ca (ironport2-out.teksavvy.com [206.248.154.183]) by mail.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C6AF1832014 for ; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 23:41:30 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAMVGik7O+K8N/2dsb2JhbABCqACBBoFTAQEEATocKAsLNBIUJSQTh3u4XYZAYQSZE4dkhEM X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.68,481,1312171200"; d="scan'208";a="139813025" Received: from 206-248-175-13.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO waltdnes.org) ([206.248.175.13]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with SMTP; 03 Oct 2011 19:41:28 -0400 Received: by waltdnes.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 03 Oct 2011 19:41:30 -0400 From: "Walter Dnes" Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 19:41:30 -0400 To: Alpine devel Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] Can Alpine be built with glibc and mdev? Message-ID: <20111003234130.GA3367@waltdnes.org> References: <20111003032414.GA27587@waltdnes.org> X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 10:08:43AM +0200, Florian Heigl wrote > As to Gentoo, maybe you just need someone else for the job, instead of > a new distro. I don't think the udev train can be stopped or forked. It's part of the same mentality that insists on systemd. I'm not a pro, so I can't give a good reason for or against systemd. What I was hoping was to be able to use mdev instead of udev. -- Walter Dnes --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---