X-Original-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Delivered-To: alpine-devel@mail.alpinelinux.org Received: from mail.wtbts.no (ti0143a340-0424.bb.online.no [88.88.156.170]) by mail.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 870AFDC13FE for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 10:13:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (bsna.nor.wtbts.net [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wtbts.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id D165FAE4001; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 10:13:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Yes Received: from mail.wtbts.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bsna.nor.wtbts.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CgAsJAtsFSzQ; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 10:13:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ytre.org (extmail.nor.wtbts.net [10.65.72.14]) by mail.wtbts.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A0F3376277; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 10:13:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ytre.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ytre.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E324A60A86F34; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 10:13:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncopa-desktop.nor.wtbts.net (ncopa-desktop.nor.wtbts.net [10.65.65.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ncopa@ytre.org) by mail.ytre.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B990C60A86A68; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 10:13:01 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 11:13:01 +0100 From: Natanael Copa To: Leonardo Arena Cc: Alpine-devel Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] advice for virtualization on desktop Message-ID: <20111215111301.0084ae3b@ncopa-desktop.nor.wtbts.net> In-Reply-To: References: <20111208075522.5804d2a6@ncopa-desktop.nor.wtbts.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.6; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP On Fri, 9 Dec 2011 11:15:54 +0100 Leonardo Arena wrote: > On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 7:55 AM, Natanael Copa > wrote: > > > > So, ideas? suggestions? > > I've used VirtualBox first and Virt-Manager extensively on Ubuntu, and > I'll definitely go with Virt-Manager. > It's more flexible and powerful than Virtualbox under several aspects. > One bad note is the configuration of networking. > Although latest versions have introduced support for macvtap that > doesn't require setting up a bridge at host level, macvtap is slow > compared to a tun interface. > So setting up networking under Virt-Manager is not trivial like in > Virtualbox. Non-trivial netoworking setups seems to be non-trivial in all virtualization solutions. Well, virtualbox and vmware makes it fairly easy. > > The problem is that Virt-Manager is still broken and may be libvirt > needs some work in order to get them fully functional under Alpine. Yeah. I think we want fir virt-manager on Alpine in any case. -nc --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---