X-Original-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Delivered-To: alpine-devel@mail.alpinelinux.org Received: from localhost (3.203.202.84.customer.cdi.no [84.202.203.3]) (using SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nc@alpinelinux.org) by mail.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2E6CFDC1B14 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 19:52:38 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 21:52:49 +0200 From: Natanael Copa To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Subject: [alpine-devel] 3.4 kernel for v2.4 stable? Message-ID: <20120822215249.5addda40@alpinelinux.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, I wonder if we should upgrade to 3.4.x kernel for v2.4 This is not something we normally do. Pros: * The current 3.3.x kernel is no longer maintained upstream * The 3.4 kernel is announced it for longterm support, 2 years. [1] * We are not the first switching from v3.3 to v3.4. Fedora 17 already did. Cons: * Risk for unexpected breakages. * We still have to backport grsecurity patches since they are not supported from grsecurity.net anymore. The 3.4 kernel is already in edge and the 120820 edge snapshot ISO has it. It would be nice if we could get feedback if that kernel works or not. (I use it on my desktop and laptop now - so far no issues) Any good reason to not upgrade to 3.4 kernel? Thanks! [1] http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1208.2/02624.html --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---