Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 08:39:49 -0400
From: Dubiousjim <dubiousjim@gmail.com>
To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org
Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] firefox 19 and 20
Message-ID: <20130718123949.GD2276@zen>
Mail-Followup-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org
References: <20130416171305.53014202@ncopa-desktop.alpinelinux.org>
 <20130717205928.GB2276@zen>
 <20130718092607.3512088e@ncopa-desktop.alpinelinux.org>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130718092607.3512088e@ncopa-desktop.alpinelinux.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 09:26:07AM +0200, Natanael Copa wrote:

> > So others may conceivably also have this bad symlink, and should also
> > remove it. It doesn't seem to be necessary at the moment. (Our repos
> > have firefox-21...and firefox-22 is available upstream, though I haven't
> > yet managed to get it to successfully build for Alpine.)
> > 
> > And as I explained above, having this symlink in place will break some
> > builds.
> 
> Yes. The issue at hand also affected freebsd. I have posed a patch
> upstream that should fix it once for all. (but havent had time to
> follow it up and submit a proper patch for upstream review)
> 
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=878791

Ah, and I see this is moz-libc-filename.patch currently in
main/xulrunner.

-- 
Dubiousjim
dubiousjim@gmail.com


---
Unsubscribe:  alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help:         alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---