Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 16:05:43 +0200
From: Natanael Copa <ncopa@alpinelinux.org>
To: Timo Teras <timo.teras@iki.fi>
Cc: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org
Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] supporting multiple libc's
Message-ID: <20130719160543.0d88c1c2@ncopa-desktop.alpinelinux.org>
In-Reply-To: <20130719154746.17b0a3cb@vostro>
References: <20130719143510.1a22ce06@ncopa-desktop.alpinelinux.org>
	<20130719154746.17b0a3cb@vostro>
Precedence: list
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 15:47:46 +0300
Timo Teras <timo.teras@iki.fi> wrote:

> > Some alternives/examples:
> > #1 whitelist what to build on (like arch)
> > 
> >   libcmask="uclibc eglibc musl"
> > 
> > or
> >   libcmask="all"
> > 
> > 
> > #2 blacklist, and use 'all' if unset
> > 
> >   libcmask="!musl !eglibc"
> > 
> > #3 blacklist via 'options'. assume 'all' if unset.
> > 
> >   options="!musl"
> 
> If using options, I'd go with options="!libc_musl" or similar.
> 
> I think we should aim at trying to have everything regardless of libc.
> So the default should be "all". And just blacklist things. Though, it
> might that at this stage with musl, we might get quite a bit of those.

Makes sense.

> I'd perhaps go with #2.

I liked options="!libc_musl"

-nc


---
Unsubscribe:  alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help:         alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---