Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 16:18:27 +0200
From: Natanael Copa <ncopa@alpinelinux.org>
To: Natanael Copa <ncopa@alpinelinux.org>
Cc: Jeff Pohlmeyer <yetanothergeek@gmail.com>,
 alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org
Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] Feature for NETDOWN=no
Message-ID: <20130802161827.5c056387@ncopa-desktop.alpinelinux.org>
In-Reply-To: <20130802161306.72f65de2@ncopa-desktop.alpinelinux.org>
References: <20130801083150.6b41dbab@ncopa-desktop.alpinelinux.org>
	<CAEuRe+0q83v0oGdgRiTm-QmP6DQFWwxxPug_2ajns3FVkOu_+g@mail.gmail.com>
	<20130802161306.72f65de2@ncopa-desktop.alpinelinux.org>
Precedence: list
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Fri, 2 Aug 2013 16:13:06 +0200
Natanael Copa <ncopa@alpinelinux.org> wrote:

> On Fri, 2 Aug 2013 07:34:28 -0500
> Jeff Pohlmeyer <yetanothergeek@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 1:31 AM, Natanael Copa <ncopa@alpinelinux.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > I got a feature request for preventing taking down an interface on
> > > shutdown. I wonder how we should implement this.
> > 
> > Since /etc/network/interfaces specifies which interfaces come up automatically,
> > wouldn't that be a good place to specify which ones come down automatically?
> 
> thats actually a good point. we should check what Debian does here.

They set NETDOWN=no in /etc/default/halt (corresponds to /etc/conf.d/halt)

I tend to agree that it makes sense to have a 'nodown eth0' or
similar in /etc/network/interfaces. But that should they do upstream.
(ifup/ifdown comes from debian)

-nc


---
Unsubscribe:  alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help:         alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---