X-Original-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Delivered-To: alpine-devel@mail.alpinelinux.org Received: from dal-a2.localdomain (unknown [74.117.189.115]) by mail.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AF55DC007C for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 05:42:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncopa-desktop.alpinelinux.org (3.203.202.84.customer.cdi.no [84.202.203.3]) (using SSLv3 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ncopa@tanael.org) by dal-a2.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 63E2DBC291A; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 10:51:54 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 12:51:49 +0200 From: Natanael Copa To: HL Cc: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] shorewall thoughts ... . Message-ID: <20130827125149.3576fa46@ncopa-desktop.alpinelinux.org> In-Reply-To: <521C65CD.6010700@gmail.com> References: <521C65CD.6010700@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.20; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:39:41 +0300 HL wrote: > Hey all, > > I was wondering if it would be possible to reconsider upgrading the > shorewall apk to the most current-stable version. > > From previous discussions I am aware of the fact that this must be done > along the perl beast, > but on the other hand this a decision that the user-admin has to make > and consider. > > I would prefer it to be there as an OPEN option. I agree. we should upgrade to latest shorewall and give users an option. > > Besides that IMHO the days that hw resources were somewhat limited as > far as RAM and CPUs are concerned are probably over. We have awall also which is much lighter on resources. > > Thanks > > Harry Lachanas. -nc --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---