X-Original-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Delivered-To: alpine-devel@mail.alpinelinux.org Received: from www.enforcer.it (www.enforcer.it [188.40.130.246]) by mail.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A93CEDC01B6 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 15:44:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.enforcer.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0404F11A for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 16:44:37 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 16:44:33 +0100 From: lists@cioccolatai.it To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] messagebus uid/gid and binaries Message-ID: <20140110154433.GJ2755@127.0.0.1> References: <20140110152150.GH2755@127.0.0.1> X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140110152150.GH2755@127.0.0.1> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 04:21:50PM +0100, lists@cioccolatai.it wrote: > is there any reason for having a lot of binaries owned by the messagebus > user, or is a bug (in the build system maybe)? > > # find /var /usr /sbin /lib -user messagebus -ls : > 8065 40 -rwxr-xr-x 1 messagebus messagebus 38176 Oct 30 09:32 /usr/sbin/chroot > 8067 8 -rwxr-xr-x 1 messagebus messagebus 5720 Oct 30 09:32 /usr/libexec/coreutils/libstdbuf.so [..] > apart from this, maybe is better to use the reserved "system" uid/gid with the > -S flag in the adduser command? > http://git.alpinelinux.org/cgit/aports/commit/?id=5a7acc3218ecf44b19312ba9b5d4962828e9ec97 > > # id messagebus > uid=1000(messagebus) gid=1000(messagebus) groups=1000(messagebus) Well, last message Maybe the two things aren't related (I got uid 1000 for dbus after install, and the packages are owned by uid 1000 for another reason - I don't known at all the alpine build system). thnx again, K. --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---